Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Ohio St 11-0
1 38 90.48%
2 2 4.76%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
5 0 0%
6 0 0%
7 0 0%
8 0 0%
9 0 0%
10 2 4.76%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #371  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:06 AM
Cincy_Kid_ES Cincy_Kid_ES is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 28
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.
Reply With Quote
  #372  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:09 AM
Flip-Flop Flip-Flop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 457
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

Ban the kiddie imo.
Reply With Quote
  #373  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:25 AM
Gislo Gislo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

[ QUOTE ]
You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you just level yourself seeing as how someone had already comment on what you just wrote before? Seriously - don’t throw bricks in glass houses...
Reply With Quote
  #374  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:25 AM
hotmark777 hotmark777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 496
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

I didnt read whole post so dont know if anyone mentioned this. Although Doyle's physical read was 100% correct (gold thought he had the nuts, and was giving off tells that it was the case), in reality the only hands that DOyle doesnt beat that is consistent with jamie gold's play are q7ss - q2ss.

Although it can be argued that these are likely holdings in this game, i think doyle still has to call/or stack gold in this situation
Reply With Quote
  #375  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:29 AM
KiwiMark KiwiMark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 60
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

[ QUOTE ]
You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understood exactly what you were saying, but I thought you were very much wrong. Part of the skill of poker is understanding your opponents, the more you respect their game the more wary you are about tangling with them - you'll take more chances against someone you think is a fish. But no one is conspiring with each other - any money you win is good, no matter who from.
Reply With Quote
  #376  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:22 AM
Mr_Moore Mr_Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

What's up with everyone going on about how good doyle read was? Gold was acting like a kid on christmas ffs..who does not pick up on that?
Reply With Quote
  #377  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:25 AM
Mr_Moore Mr_Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?
Reply With Quote
  #378  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:36 AM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

Gold raised because he felt he had the best hand, I don't know why he is being villified for it. Like others have said it's easy when you can see the hole cards but seriously who there wouldn't think a 9-high flush would be good after Doyle made such a weak bet
Reply With Quote
  #379  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:36 AM
chipwiz chipwiz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

[ QUOTE ]
By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhm.. no.
Reply With Quote
  #380  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:36 AM
21SuicideKing21 21SuicideKing21 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Are You My Caucasian?
Posts: 1,063
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)

[ QUOTE ]
By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, I agree that Gold literally had thought he had the best hand there since he prob thought Doyle had some strong A. I'm sort of surprised that Doyle didn't just call and see what the river brought, since he was in position, but I think he saw or heard something that Jaime said that must of meant that Jaime was strong, cause Antonio did comment that Doyle was strong and folded something good there. So I don't know, very curious and wondering what Doyle's thinking was on that hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.