#1
|
|||
|
|||
NLTRN 33 dollars
PokerStars Game #10217694743: Tournament #51785118, $33.00+$1.50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2007/06/01 - 15:33:44 (ET)
Table '51785118 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Rimoro (1490 in chips) Seat 2: RyPac13 (1510 in chips) RyPac13: posts small blind 10 Rimoro: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RyPac13 [7s Js] RyPac13: raises 40 to 60 Rimoro: calls 40 *** FLOP *** [Qd 7d 3c] Rimoro: checks RyPac13: bets 60 Rimoro: raises 60 to 120 RyPac13: calls 60 *** TURN *** [Qd 7d 3c] [Qh] Rimoro: checks RyPac13: bets 200 I think most would say th is is bet/fold, so this hand may suck. It's the second hand of the match, villain is a loser on Sharkscope over like 50 HU games, looks like he plays mostly 33s and 55s. What do you do if he calls and the river is a non flush 3? What do you do if he minraises? If you call the minraise what do you do if the river is a non flush 3? Does anybody do anything other than bet/fold this turn and if he calls and river is that card check behind/fold to a bet? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN 33 dollars
So he folded his small blind in first hand. I tend to give people like that a bunch of respect until they prove they aren't nitty.
I would fold to the flop minraise. Otherwise, yeah, bet/fold |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN 33 dollars
Bet/fold looks right without any read. I'd probably bet a little less, but whatever.
soop: folding one small blind does not a read make. And folding to the flop minraise is painfully tight and is losing play heads-up. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN 33 dollars
Sure you can get a read from someone folding one blind. You think if you took your PT database and compared people who folded their sb to people who didn't, the folders aren't going to be significantly tighter for the rest of the match.
Hmm this looks like something I should write a query to figure out. |
|
|