Results Of Any Skill vs Luck Court Cases?

[The Big Sleazy]

Go with God?

[The Big Sleazy]

btw thanks for the chuck contact, i'll be getting ahold of him soon.

[DeliciousBass]

I think Tworooks is the guy to ask.

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
exactly what part of "Results Of Any Skill vs Luck Court Cases?" did you not get?

[/ QUOTE ]

fyi you came across like a real dick in this thread.

[Punker]

Look up Billy Baxter's case vs the IRS. Favorable ruling, with the judge finishing up by saying "If the government really believes poker is not a game of skill, I invite them to sit down at a table with Mr Baxter" or something similar.

[The Big Sleazy]

[ QUOTE ]
Huh, yeah sure ..... go right ahead. I think you have the perfect defense:

"Hey, your honor, I asked a bunch of anonymous posters on 2+2 if it was legal."


[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
exactly what part of "Results Of Any Skill vs Luck Court Cases?" did you not get?

[/ QUOTE ]

fyi you came across like a real dick in this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]sorry that comment kind of irked me

[The Big Sleazy]

[ QUOTE ]
Look up Billy Baxter's case vs the IRS. Favorable ruling, with the judge finishing up by saying "If the government really believes poker is not a game of skill, I invite them to sit down at a table with Mr Baxter" or something similar.

[/ QUOTE ]thank you

[oldbookguy]

Though everyone credits Billy Baxter, the IRS chose a different case they thought there was a better chance to win, http://nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu/~acadian/...etzingered.pdf

This case was decided in 1987.

The REAL importance here is an argument that everyone overlooks, in the case the Supreme Court ruled for Groetzinger AND STATES that GAMBLING is a 'SKILL'!

He wagered on Dog racing.

You will find this at the bottom of page 5 in Red.

obg

[The Big Sleazy]

Billy Baxter vs United States

[The Big Sleazy]

thank you oldbookguy