|
|
#11
10-17-2007, 10:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 66 SB
[ QUOTE ]
anyone check raise this turn? then check call the river. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's spew. You'd have to be at least 66% sure he's on the flushdraw to do that. [ QUOTE ] Betting and raising for info is useles in LHE. Dont do it! [/ QUOTE ] Amen! It's also useless in NL (and probably every form of poker). 
|
|
#12
10-17-2007, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 66 SB
Post-flop is standard, but this is close for me pre-flop.
|
|
#13
10-17-2007, 10:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 66 SB
[ QUOTE ]
thanks...how are the sklansky books for small stakes? i'm cheap so i'll order one order one once i get enough fpp's if it's worth it. i think i have a pretty good feel for the game so far and its way better than being a fish in NL [/ QUOTE ] Winning in SH on a small sample is meaningless. Small stakes hold'em is ok to understand the basis, but it is just about full ring. Winning in tough hold'em games is great but it's not for the beginners. If I was you, I will start to play full ring to master the basis. There is less marginal decisions and tough spots, the rake is lower too.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
