#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
Fold. No just kidding - I like a smaller 3bet here as we probably have the most FE with this line. If you're considering just calling his 116 raise the turn pot will be $284 and you will have $547 remaining and a c/r here is getting called all the time. I hate the idea of calling the flop and c/f a turn which doesn't heart up or drop a T considering with a some pressure we can get villain to drop quite a few made hands on this flop; it may be drawy but 3 people saw it and he'll have a tough time not looking for the fold button when you put pressure on him.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't know why all lines includes getting all-in almost 2 buy-ins deep vs a nit showing aggression. I'm sure your fe is very limited and at best you have 44% eq, at worst 13%. Calling and check/shoving a blank turn is by far the worst line suggested. [/ QUOTE ] Nick, What line do you believe is most optimal? [/ QUOTE ] My initial reaction was to just call the raise getting decent odds and check/fold the turn UI. I think if we call the flop the only way to play the turn UI is to check/fold. Unless we're getting priced in on the turn in which case we obv can call. I don't like the idea of donk/3-betting vs this kind of player because his raise range on the flop is probably really strong. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
[ QUOTE ]
There's no sense in which this hand belongs in SSNL? [/ QUOTE ] I mostly post in ssnl an didnt rly think about it. [ QUOTE ] I don't know why all lines includes getting all-in almost 2 buy-ins deep vs a nit showing aggression. I'm sure your fe is very limited and at best you have 44% eq, at worst 13%. [/ QUOTE ] I have ~40% equity v his range so I dont need much fe w/ all the money already in the pot to make getting it in a gd idea. I also think the hands I have the best equity against are by far the biggest parts of his range. I just wanted to see what people thought was the best way to maximise my fe. I dont rly see anything wrong w/ calling an donking hearts, c/r:ing a straight but I think playing it more aggressivly fits better into my overall gameplan. [ QUOTE ] Calling and check/shoving a blank turn is by far the worst line suggested. [/ QUOTE ] Agree w/ people saying this. I didnt rly think about stack sizes. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
[ QUOTE ]
I have ~40% equity v his range so I dont need much fe w/ all the money already in the pot to make getting it in a gd idea. I also think the hands I have the best equity against are by far the biggest parts of his range. I just wanted to see what people thought was the best way to maximise my fe. [/ QUOTE ] I don't even think pushing is +ev. Given that you're deep vill needs to fold almost 25% and I don't think he will. [ QUOTE ] also think the hands I have the best equity against are by far the biggest parts of his range. [/ QUOTE ] This doesn't make sense. Why would he be more likely to raise AA/KK/AQ than QQ/88? [ QUOTE ] I dont rly see anything wrong w/ calling an donking hearts, c/r:ing a straight but I think playing it more aggressivly fits better into my overall gameplan. [/ QUOTE ] I like this line. Edit for calcs: EV when called: 0.4*(679 + 16 + 56) - 0.6(679 - 16 - 56) = -$64 When you push and he folds you win: 52 + 40 + 116 = +$208 He needs to fold: 64/(208 + 64) = 24% This is actually even worse because he'll only fold hands you're in relatively good shape against which means your eq vs his calling range is less than 40%. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
As others have said, you have to assume you have very little FE here.
So call, CRAI straights. Donk flush turns. Otherwise, fold unless you're getting really good odds. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
[ QUOTE ]
This doesn't make sense. Why would he be more likely to raise AA/KK/AQ than QQ/88? [/ QUOTE ] Its not that hes more likely to raise them its that theres alot more combos of them an I think he limps 88 behind some pf. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
Results?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This doesn't make sense. Why would he be more likely to raise AA/KK/AQ than QQ/88? [/ QUOTE ] Its not that hes more likely to raise them its that theres alot more combos of them an I think he limps 88 behind some pf. [/ QUOTE ] Easily cancelled out by the fact that he's more likely to raise a set 2 buy-in deep and that 33 isn't even included in his range. That pretty much makes up for him sometimes limping 88/33. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
yeah i would 3bet here to $300 or something like that, following up with a shove on the turn if called
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: gutter+fd a little deep
i like the fact that we are deep, it gives us better FE. i'm not sure how much FE we have but we only need a tiny bit to make a profit
|
|
|