Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:28 PM
PrimetimeUNH PrimetimeUNH is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 79
Default 66 SB

I've only been playing LH for 4 days, but I've had alot of success to this point. My roll is too small to be playing this level, but I figured I'd give it a shot because of how I've been doing. I'm wondering if I played this hand correctly or like a pussy because of the size of the bets. No reads yet, just sat down, second hand.
PokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (5 handed) Hand History converter Courtesy of PokerZion.com

Preflop: Hero is SB with 6[[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]], 6[[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]].
2 folds</font>, Button calls, Hero raises</font>, BB calls, Button calls.

Flop: (6 SB) 5[[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]], 3[[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]], 8[[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]] (3 players)</font>
Hero bets</font>, BB raises</font>, Button folds, Hero calls.

Turn: (5 BB) 3[[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]] (2 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (7 BB) 8[[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] (2 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 9 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:34 PM
JSmith2007 JSmith2007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: 66 SB

Against an unknown, I donk the turn to see if he raises. My pure choice against unknown would be B/F the turn. Calling down may not be so bad either I guess, but BB is on a very wide range, including any 3 or any 8, as well as a busted club draw so calling down is fine too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:42 PM
milesdyson milesdyson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: trying to 363 u
Posts: 14,916
Default Re: 66 SB

hand is very standard. you beat 5x, thus you call down.

[ QUOTE ]
My pure choice against unknown would be B/F the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
you will be raised by worse hands enough that this is a bad decision, and you won't be raised by worse hands enough that you'd rather bet/call the turn than check/call it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:45 PM
JSmith2007 JSmith2007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: 66 SB

So, just call it down and not bet the turn? Kind of confused there as you say you'd rather bet/call turn, but then say call down.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:05 AM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 66 SB

[ QUOTE ]
So, just call it down and not bet the turn? Kind of confused there as you say you'd rather bet/call turn, but then say call down.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jsmith

Miles is telling you that c/c &gt; b/c &gt; b/f.

Which I think most agree with.

You have to stop betting and raising for info and then fold. People raise and reraise you with worse hands too much.

Betting and raising for info is useles in LHE. Dont do it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-17-2007, 03:30 AM
dbeckham dbeckham is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: enjoying life on an aero bed
Posts: 109
Default Re: 66 SB

anyone check raise this turn? then check call the river.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2007, 10:20 AM
Wolfram Wolfram is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Reykjavik
Posts: 3,306
Default Re: 66 SB

[ QUOTE ]
anyone check raise this turn? then check call the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think that's spew. You'd have to be at least 66% sure he's on the flushdraw to do that.

[ QUOTE ]

Betting and raising for info is useles in LHE. Dont do it!

[/ QUOTE ]
Amen!

It's also useless in NL (and probably every form of poker).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:47 PM
PrimetimeUNH PrimetimeUNH is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 79
Default Re: 66 SB

thanks...how are the sklansky books for small stakes? i'm cheap so i'll order one order one once i get enough fpp's if it's worth it. i think i have a pretty good feel for the game so far and its way better than being a fish in NL
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-17-2007, 10:54 AM
frenchpignouf frenchpignouf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: out of the rake trap
Posts: 171
Default Re: 66 SB

[ QUOTE ]
thanks...how are the sklansky books for small stakes? i'm cheap so i'll order one order one once i get enough fpp's if it's worth it. i think i have a pretty good feel for the game so far and its way better than being a fish in NL

[/ QUOTE ]

Winning in SH on a small sample is meaningless.

Small stakes hold'em is ok to understand the basis, but it is just about full ring. Winning in tough hold'em games is great but it's not for the beginners.

If I was you, I will start to play full ring to master the basis. There is less marginal decisions and tough spots, the rake is lower too.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-17-2007, 02:02 AM
CR the LAGs CR the LAGs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 41
Default Re: 66 SB

[ QUOTE ]
My roll is too small to be playing this level, but I figured I'd give it a shot because of how I've been doing.

[/ QUOTE ]

sounds a lot like me...dont do it

donking turn = retarded. id raise you with jack [censored] if you pulled that on me
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.