|
|
|
|
#1
09-14-2006, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
Cool post.
Hand 1: I really think he has AQ (maybe AK) or better and you are getting called. You raised UTG and he's been giving you respect, I think he's pitching most weaker aces from OOP. Hand 2: He 3-bets a lot and ya'll are deep but I just give this one up preflop. Boring I know. I'd probably just check the river but I think if I bet I'd bet a lot more. Hand 3: I like this one. 
|
|
#3
09-14-2006, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
[ QUOTE ]
Cool post. Hand 1: I really think he has AQ (maybe AK) or better and you are getting called. You raised UTG and he's been giving you respect, I think he's pitching most weaker aces from OOP. Hand 2: He 3-bets a lot and ya'll are deep but I just give this one up preflop. Boring I know. I'd probably just check the river but I think if I bet I'd bet a lot more. Hand 3: I like this one. [/ QUOTE ] totally agree.
|
|
#4
09-14-2006, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
Hand 1 - I think you got called. Board is drawless - yeah, the 4 got there, but not much else is out there. How often would you say you three-barrel? If not often, maybe you forced a fold of AQ.
Hand 2 - how is that a good card for you to bet? Your hand has some showdown value - are you trying to fold out better nines and any tens? It's a pretty thin bluff. I can't imagine you're folding out an overpair for that little - I dunno how much metagame you have w/ Booosted or if you intentionally sized your bet to look like an overpair should pay it off - but booosted's range here is enormous, no? He's calling w/ any J, any 8, any KQ. Hand 3 worked.
|
|
#6
09-14-2006, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
[ QUOTE ]
I like the first two. Third one is meh. Villain seems more like a fish than a TAG f/ his bet size. [/ QUOTE ] i duno how much party you play lately, but lolo started programming his bets like that with AHK and i think there are a couple of copycats out there. so i wouldn't put too much stock in the bet size amt.
|
|
#7
09-14-2006, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I like the first two. Third one is meh. Villain seems more like a fish than a TAG f/ his bet size. [/ QUOTE ] i duno how much party you play lately, but lolo started programming his bets like that with AHK and i think there are a couple of copycats out there. so i wouldn't put too much stock in the bet size amt. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not talking abt the pennies but the fact that he bets 1/3 pot into 2 players on the flop.
|
|
#9
09-14-2006, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
interesting concept for a post. obviously, these are all highly situation dependent. dissecting the hands in a vacuum, here are some thoughts:
your story in hand 1 doesn't add up to a big hand. and any hand with showdown value against villain's range would likely be checked behind on the river. so your firing on the river smells a lot like a bluff, unless you are prone to super thin value bets. in hand 2, i think you have the potential to push villain off a better hand, but i think your bet size seems a little to small. i would put in about 2400-2500 at least, and villain has a hard time calling this without a jack or better. against a villain is who is capable of over analyzing the situation, your small bet could work. on hand 3 river is a good scare card, so there is a chance this one can work against most hands in villain's range except tt. but it only costs him 1250 to call, so it's a toss up.
|
|
#10
09-14-2006, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Bluff(s) Worked?
[ QUOTE ]
your story in hand 1 doesn't add up to a big hand. and any hand with showdown value against villain's range would likely be checked behind on the river. so your firing on the river smells a lot like a bluff, unless you are prone to super thin value bets. [/ QUOTE ] i cant ever have a set or two pair or maybe AK here?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
