Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:21 AM
terrible terrible is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 353
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[ QUOTE ]
It's totally unethical, just like cheating on your taxes, and just about everyone who's successful is unethical.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha, so true.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:23 AM
FoxwoodsFiend FoxwoodsFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 4,497
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[ QUOTE ]
lol at the people debating the effectiveness of tag teaming when the question being asked is that of ethics.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, obviously the two are related: if tagteaming has no effect or a detrimental effect then it would be really weird to say it's unethical.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:26 AM
Statutory Statutory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Don\'t worry I won\'t tell.
Posts: 434
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

Long been established there is no one player per hand rule online.

Coaching is so standard nowadays, real time sweat is a great learning tool. I frequently chop action with a friend and talk strategy for an hour session.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:37 AM
BenG2813 BenG2813 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 26
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

i dont think people should do it. and when they do i t just makes them look incompetent.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-12-2007, 01:48 PM
FTheFish FTheFish is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol at the people debating the effectiveness of tag teaming when the question being asked is that of ethics.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, obviously the two are related: if tagteaming has no effect or a detrimental effect then it would be really weird to say it's unethical.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. It's all about intent, and I'm pretty sure you think it would be advantageous, or else you wouldn't be doing it. BTW not calling you out but rather just making a poimt.
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:00 PM
EWS87 EWS87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

TonyBliar: flip??
DaEvils: nah no flip
DaEvils: lost my last one
TonyBliar: wow
TonyBliar: pussy
DaEvils: fine
DaEvils: flip
TonyBliar: u going down
TonyBliar: nh
TonyBliar: moron
TonyBliar: wow
DaEvils: ding ding
TonyBliar: fu
TonyBliar: u should stick to rapping
TonyBliar: u better at that than at poker
TonyBliar: flipping is for
TonyBliar: for noone
TonyBliar: except u
TonyBliar: i shoulda practive avoidance
TonyBliar: fu
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:08 PM
prodonkey prodonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: underrating women on teh interweb
Posts: 5,993
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

wonder how much EV good players could get from "renting" known very bad players accounts.

regarding people allowed to have multiple accts. like PA, I think this is a very big advantage for them. You only have a player pool of so many people at the very large stakes. You play these people often and u learn their tendancies and adjust.

It's an advantage you can't have in live play, unless you're going to get plastic surgery, or wear a halloween mask at the table. You can't look at peoples faces online, all you have is their name, too important of an item to allow people to change all the time imo.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:09 PM
(o_0) (o_0) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 59
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

DaEvils = Prah?

Deny or confirm
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:04 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 13,960
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly, I think that in poker, I'd prefer to play a headsup match against 3 people of equal strength colluding, than one player.

This is very pronounced in blitz chess, when working together with 2-3 people, assuming all are relatively equal strength, generally produces worse results than just playing normally because all the differing viewpoints can be really distracting. At least this has always been my experience.

Whenever I have played poker with someone watching me, it drives me completely insane when they try to give advice that's contrary to what I'm about to do. It's simply impossible to focus when you only have so much time to make a decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet if you took a group of three very strong chess players who were close friends, worked on each others' games a lot, and had a lot of experience playing together, that they would play better as a team than individually (assuming this was some version of chess where taking longer on every decision didn't hurt you).

I think, ethically speaking, that it is somewhat shady, but not that bad. I think people can generally assume it's going on at nosebleed stakes, so it isn't super dishonest or anything.

I think what PA does is significantly worse. These guys are still playing on their own accounts, and the owner of the account still has the final say on a given action.

[/ QUOTE ]

When referring to collusion in chess I meant speed chess, where you have about 5 minutes per game. This is because this is the common form of Internet chess so if you are at someones house and want to play together, you play a few quick games and you realize that you basically suck playing with each other's input. In a slow game it would be hugely beneficial.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 11-14-2007, 05:16 AM
Shaolin Temple Shaolin Temple is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Default Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila



Jman got caught out the other week too doing it, typing his hand into what he thought was MSN/AIM etc. so the questiony ou should be asking is who isn't doing it

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is true then why hasnt he been banned?? And what site was this on?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.