|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: uNL Hand Reading Practice
-----
Hand 11 Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter Hero (CO): $52.55 BTN: $78.75 SB: $51.25 BB: $19.85 UTG: $53.60 MP: $58.70 Pre-Flop: XX dealt to Hero (CO) <font color="red">UTG raises to $2</font>, MP folds, Hero calls $2, 3 folds Flop: ($4.75) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $4</font>, UTG calls $4 Turn: ($12.75) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $9.50</font>, <font color="red">UTG raises to $38</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $46.55 and is All-In</font>, UTG calls $8.55 <font color="green">zzzzzzzz, another set. My 66 > KQ. </font> ----- Is this a cooler? If you instead were the one with KQ would you even consider folding to Villian's huge turn raise? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: uNL Hand Reading Practice
Grunch
Hand 1: AQ, 77, perhaps AKhh. I don't see many other combo draws playing the turn aggressively. Hand 2: 44, 55, mayyybe AA. I don't see you flat calling with 68dd or any non paired 3 pre. Also, I don't think that you play 66 that aggressively on the turn. Hand 3: AQ, KQ Hand 4: KQ is really the only line I can see you taking a pot control line on the turn with and betting for value on the river. Hand 5: A set, AJ, or 78dd, 67dd, 79dd, KQdd. Hand 6: Most likely hand is 66. I don't think that you are betting anything less than a straight for value on the river, and hands that you limp behind on the flop (suited connectors, mid pairs) aren't raising the flop and value betting the river. Hand 7: Likely an overpair. Hand 8: 66-99 Hand 9: Set it and forget it, possibly QJ. Hand 10: Im going to say 88, maybe a set. Hand 11: KQ, AQss, 66 or 33 Hand 12: Some one pair type hand, prolly AK |
|
|