wtf did I get myself into

PickyTooth · #1 05-31-2006, 10:39 PM

villain is unknown never seen him before.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

saw flop|saw showdown

MP ($846)
Hero ($1970)
SB ($1842.54)
BB ($2118)
UTG ($2098)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $10.
2 folds, Hero raises to $70, 1 fold, BB calls $50.

Flop: ($150) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($150) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $120, BB calls $120.

River: ($390) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 players)
river he led 300 I made it 900 he pushed........
Final Pot: $390

Results in white below: 
BB has As 4s (flush, ace high).
Hero has 8s Ks (flush, king high).
Outcome: BB wins $390.

AZK · #2 05-31-2006, 11:07 PM

both of you hitting back door flushes is highly unlikely and sick when it happens......that is....when you bet the flop. When you don't bet the flop, and the turn/river action goes like this, it's pretty [censored] obvious.

FGators · #3 05-31-2006, 11:09 PM

Cooler. Im not sure if I can fold on the river, but his raising has all but announced he has the nuts.

gol4pro · #4 05-31-2006, 11:43 PM

folding this hand here is ridiculous and results oriented. You should be thrilled to call here.

TStoneMBD · #5 06-01-2006, 12:21 AM

are you advocating folding the river? folding seems pretty ridiculous.

PickyTooth · #6 06-01-2006, 12:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
both of you hitting back door flushes is highly unlikely and sick when it happens......that is....when you bet the flop. When you don't bet the flop, and the turn/river action goes like this, it's pretty [censored] obvious.

[/ QUOTE ]

yah really I dont remember the last time I didn't Cbet in a spot like this.

PickyTooth · #7 06-01-2006, 01:04 AM

[ QUOTE ]
folding this hand here is ridiculous and results oriented. You should be thrilled to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

how about if you replace the 9 of spades for the 2 of spades ?

James282 · #8 06-01-2006, 01:12 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
folding this hand here is ridiculous and results oriented. You should be thrilled to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

how about if you replace the 9 of spades for the 2 of spades ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think folding on the end here isn't bad at all. You should never 'be thrilled' to get your money in here. The King, Jack, 9, 8, and 6 of spades are all accounted for. You are hoping he has exactly QT of spades(which would prob bet the turn) and that he would 3 bet all in after you raise a spade river. 54 spades just doesn't do it here. I think a fold is the far superior play.
-James

James282 · #9 06-01-2006, 01:15 AM

[ QUOTE ]
ya really, I don't see why ppl think this is a call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because they are rank suckers and Sklansky's sister could bust them all?
-James

Edit: And, you deleted your reply. I still agree with you mystery man [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

PickyTooth · #10 06-01-2006, 01:16 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
folding this hand here is ridiculous and results oriented. You should be thrilled to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

how about if you replace the 9 of spades for the 2 of spades ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think folding on the end here isn't bad at all. You should never 'be thrilled' to get your money in here. The King, Jack, 9, 8, and 6 of spades are all accounted for. You are hoping he has exactly QT of spades(which would prob bet the turn) and that he would 3 bet all in after you raise a spade river. 54 spades just doesn't do it here. I think a fold is the far superior play.
-James

[/ QUOTE ]

couldnt he put me on a straight tho ?