|
|
|
|
#1
05-17-2007, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: awkward stack sizes -- 2/4 nl 800
[ QUOTE ]
i know. andi think pushing is obviously the way for max value. [/ QUOTE ] I think you can even fold minimum set for a push over a $120 bet with $550 behind. I'm not opposed to C/R a blank river. C/C a scary river (including a diamond). 
|
|
#2
05-17-2007, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: awkward stack sizes -- 2/4 nl 800
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i know. andi think pushing is obviously the way for max value. [/ QUOTE ] I think you can even fold minimum set for a push over a $120 bet with $550 behind. I'm not opposed to C/R a blank river. C/C a scary river (including a diamond). [/ QUOTE ] I don't think hero's range is that narrow at all. He could easily be shoving a combo-draw and possibly 2 pair. Unless hero is super tight/nitty which I don't think he is, I would immagine most villains are calling all sets along with most 2pair hands
|
|
#3
05-18-2007, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: awkward stack sizes -- 2/4 nl 800
yea, i just push that now. you could rr to like 320, but the problem with a raise to 320 is that he'll know youre not just on a FD. also, if the river brings the four card straight, he will fold his set and you wont get all his cash.
pushing here (the turn) will give him the chance of convincing himself that youre on the nut FD (assuming he isnt) or a big combo draw and he might be willing to call you with his set.
|
|
#4
05-20-2007, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: awkward stack sizes -- 2/4 nl 800
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i know. andi think pushing is obviously the way for max value. [/ QUOTE ] I think you can even fold minimum set for a push over a $120 bet with $550 behind. I'm not opposed to C/R a blank river. C/C a scary river (including a diamond). [/ QUOTE ] Lol @ folding a set in HU for less than 2 buy-ins.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
