Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2007, 05:32 PM
facepull facepull is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default what is the better gamble for pro players?

is the better gamble limit hold'em or no-limit hold'em for pro players? each has risks but it seems that no-limit actually has greater risks then limit. ie: a bad run at limit you can step down and still be in action. a bad run at no-limit and you can be broke. i know that no-limit allows you to win more per hour but the risk could be greater or is it? im mainly talking about brick and mortar not the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2007, 06:32 PM
Gonso Gonso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seat zero
Posts: 3,265
Default Re: what is the better gamble for pro players?

Limit HE is very swingy for me, although my WR is almost the same as my NLHE game. Variance in LHE is no joke when it turns on you, it's pretty deceptive. In both games you need to be appropriately bankrolled, and I wouldn't call one easier than another.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2007, 07:26 PM
Pokerfarian Pokerfarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 594
Default Re: what is the better gamble for pro players?

The ratio of profit:variance is much better in NLHE than LHE, so your unlikely to go on as long/many downswings in NLHE
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2007, 11:17 PM
jstill jstill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: downtown portsmouth
Posts: 3,641
Default Re: what is the better gamble for pro players?

eppp your kinda off about most everything...

the only thing I ll say is with proper BR management your chance of going broke should be the same in either game. Ideally you should set your BR requirements based on an underestimated empirical guess at your winrate and std deviation and your preferential risk of ruin calcs based on your preferred confidence interval).

if you prefer more generic BR management if your a winner at NL or limit as long as you follow 20-30 BIs or 300-500 BBs for limit, your not more likely to bust in NL or vice versa, and either one you can and should step down after a bad run or significant hit to your roll.

that gophers sick btw gonso
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:19 PM
JLimbs JLimbs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 101
Default Re: what is the better gamble for pro players?

[ QUOTE ]
The ratio of profit:variance is much better in NLHE than LHE, so your unlikely to go on as long/many downswings in NLHE

[/ QUOTE ]

In my experience this is generally true. I think the main reason for it is because you have less control over your money in limit. When you have an edge you are only able to bet according to the structure of the game.

In no limit its possible to get more money in the pot when you have an edge which serves as increased value as well as protection for your hand.

-Jerry
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.