#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL$200| Does pushing have a +ev expectation here?
Mistere, he's straightforward enough in his calling massive bets range. He's a winning player and winning players know that Aces have to be folded to this sort of action. Where he's tricky is when he's in a raised or 3-bet pot with position. He's good at putting people to tough commitment decisions, etc thus with AKs OOP I could get into trouble. I will 3-bet him most times but probably not when he's come from UTG and I'm OOP.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL$200| Does pushing have a +ev expectation here?
Always shove here.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL$200| Does pushing have a +ev expectation here?
[ QUOTE ]
Always shove here. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. This shove looks like the best play to me. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL$200| Does pushing have a +ev expectation here?
Villain 2 who called the AI had 33 and turned quads. I've had a spate of these where villain has always had the set, made the call and held up. It makes me question the play a little but ultimately it's just variance. I see this as a no-brainer shove and have to continue to see it that way irrespective of results.
|
|
|