|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
bet shove turn ya
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
bet/call, shove turn
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
Bet $60. 3bet all in.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
i hate that idea. just bet and shove turn
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
[ QUOTE ]
i hate that idea. just bet and shove turn [/ QUOTE ] Always? I think it's a nice way to sometimes get some extra bluff chips in the pot, and we get the last bet in. What particularly don't you like about it? If we want to take the more normal approach, I think 110-130ish looks good, cuz it leaves us with some FE on the turn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
Or go all in
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
To those who said check behind: If you are advocating checking behind here, your first thought should be NOT 3-betting preflop. It's not like we 3-bet for value you know.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s *DELETED*
Post deleted by markuisis
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl - Re-raised pot with 54s
My point is a 39/12/2 fish does not fold much preflop so you are going to see postflop action. And with 100BB stacks you need to win this a fair amount postflop by applying pressure, not by flopping big. 3-bet preflop is essentially a "massage the pot"-bet with the calling station in there, and thats not a good play with 100BBs.
So... checking the flop means we are not able to make him fold enough of his range to make a 3-bet preflop profitable. |
|
|