Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #441  
Old 10-26-2007, 03:56 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of 2000+ predictions, only 10 brave, depressing souls predicted our probable final record of 5-7.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

[/ QUOTE ]

As much as Bigdaddy is in denial, the sad thing is he is one of the most reasonable Domers out there, as evidenced by this article. "Rivals says he recruits well, so he is awesome!"

So many excuses, its amazing. Just a huge amount of denial, it could only be from Catholics. Oh well, you guys are going to have to learn the hard way after he brings you down so low, the only national title you can compete for is Division III.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm an idiot and didn't see this coming at all-- but 5-7 is the probable final record is in an entirely different category. In what sense "probable"?

How about: You hold that thought, raise as much money as you have/can find, and I'll give you 2:1 on it and make a hefty donation to ND in your name-- whether I/you win or lose the bet!

It's funny that it is actually progress when ND fan says that of course their coach had a ton to learn about running a program-- they were the only folks who didn't think it was likely. Funnier still that they now confess to have been deeply skeptical of that silly contract extension.
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 10-26-2007, 04:40 PM
FlyWf FlyWf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Brian Coming imo
Posts: 3,237
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

Austiger- I suspect that you're using football years and ND is using scholastic years. Not that it makes you wrong if you are, you're clearly right. I'd love to see someone(calling Michigan bloggers!) do a ND/OSU/LSU comparison. Especially OSU, who has been easily out-recruited by ND since their bowl game.
Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 10-26-2007, 05:04 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

congrats to Weis for raiding the Nebraska pantry as their ship sinks

well...at least one of the big boys is going down hard
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 10-26-2007, 06:35 PM
domer2 domer2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 370
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

This year's record nonwithstanding, this is the second greatest recruiting class Notre Dame has ever had (with Floyd and Jonas Gray), barely behind 1988. Number 3 isn't close. This could end up being the best if Weis closes with a couple more and holds onto the commitments.

He is getting it done in that area. In 2008, we will be way too loaded with talent for any excuses. Plus we get Gary Gray back from injury -- future Sundayer. I think our defense will be a huge strength in 2008, it'll be up to Weis to get Clausen ready to go. There will be no flirting with a spread offense.
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:18 AM
Bigdaddydvo Bigdaddydvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Funtown, USA
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
Okay, I found Auburn's participation stats. I'd love to see Florida's too, but here are ours compared to ND's. I combined the Sr and 5th yr senior totals for ND since I don't have Auburn's separated.

NOTRE DAME - eight games played
Fr - 15
So - 48
Jr - 45
Sr - 68

Auburn (8 games):
Fr - 38
So - 37
Jr - 43
Sr - 58

NOTRE DAME OFFENSIVE LINE
Fr - 0
So - 16
Jr - 16
Sr - 8

Auburn:
Fr - 20
So - 0
Jr - 16
Sr - 4

QB:
NOTRE DAME
Fr - 6
So - 1
Jr - 1
Sr - 0
5th- 0

Auburn:
Fr- 1
Sr- 7

Also the overall numbers don't include special teams. Auburn's kicker and punter are both freshmen. Most of our KO returns have been by a freshman. Our punt returner is a junior, but was replaced by a freshman @ LSU. I have no idea what ND's special teams experience is, but you can't get younger than that.

So all in all, Auburn is actually less experienced by a decent margin. ND's schedule is 2nd toughest according to Sagarin. Auburn's is #3. So that excuse doesn't hold either.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice work compiling these.

Obviously, Auburn has done a much, much better job of working in their young talent into the lineup. CW's approach to the same problem has thus far proved to be disasterous. It was the first time in 3 yrs as the ND coach that he's had to contend with a problem like this, and he's failed miserably thus far.
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:24 AM
Bigdaddydvo Bigdaddydvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Funtown, USA
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of 2000+ predictions, only 10 brave, depressing souls predicted our probable final record of 5-7.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

[/ QUOTE ]

As much as Bigdaddy is in denial, the sad thing is he is one of the most reasonable Domers out there, as evidenced by this article. "Rivals says he recruits well, so he is awesome!"

So many excuses, its amazing. Just a huge amount of denial, it could only be from Catholics. Oh well, you guys are going to have to learn the hard way after he brings you down so low, the only national title you can compete for is Division III.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh. It's a Catholic thing now? Do we need to move this thread over to SMP?
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:49 AM
Bigdaddydvo Bigdaddydvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Funtown, USA
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

Tom, Bernie, Shemp, MT2R, et al,

I don't think our opinions on the state of the ND program are THAT far off from one another...I mainly think the differences are more sharply contrasted by the fact that I really really like Notre Dame and most of you really really don't. So, I'd like to make a couple general statements about the program that hopefully we can reach a consensus on:

1) Weis was moderately successful in his first two years, achieving the first back to back 9+ win seasons since '92-'93. While lacking a "signature win," Weis regularly defeated average teams that had given the Irish problems under previous coaching regimes (MSU in '05 notwithstanding). In short, he beat the teams he was supposed to beat...this was a huge sigh of relief for anyone that endured the Bob Davie/Ty Willingham era. Based on his performance in '05-'06, Charlie Weis is a capable head coach when leading a veteran team.

2) Weis has done an atrocious job this year of incorporating young talent into the starting lineup, and his focus on schemes vs. football fundamentals of running/passing/blocking/tackling has led to disasterous results on the football field. There might be some explanations for the team's performance (inexperience and tough schedule) but no excuse for how poorly the team has played. Weis, even with said explanations, is solidly responsible for the product on the field.

3) Weis is actively rectifying any talent deficiencies through hard and very productive work on the recruiting trail. When his third top ten class is wrapped up (likely the best in the nation), next year he'll have all of the talent and experience he needs to field a competitive Irish squad. If he fails, count on most Domers to politely request his resignation.

Is this analysis fair enough?
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 10-27-2007, 02:09 AM
Bigdaddydvo Bigdaddydvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Funtown, USA
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
congrats to Weis for raiding the Nebraska pantry as their ship sinks

well...at least one of the big boys is going down hard

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL.

Actually, ND was always the top choice for #3 rated RB Jonas Gray. ND hadn't offered a scholarship to him early enough, since their top choices Frostproof RB Carlton Thomas committed to UGA, while Ryan Williams and Cyrus Gray remain uncommitted. The Irish then had several transfers that free up spots for this class, Gray decommitted from NU, ND offered, and Gray accepted.

Circumstances simply worked out to make this kid an offer, and since he was high on ND to begin with, it's really a natural fit.
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 10-27-2007, 10:47 AM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

That is fair enough on the ground you covered:

1) 05-06, ND had good years, and Weis deserves credit.
2) Weis deserves credit for successful recruiting.
3) Weis has failed to prepared his team well for 07.

We differ on degrees here and there, and then there are other areas of disagreement, but yeah, okay.
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 10-27-2007, 11:46 AM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Looking for law jobs
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

Of course Shemp I think the issue is what are their prospects going forward? They have talent, albeit young talent, and more coming in. So from the first three seasons, what can we tell about Weis' ability to lead the team?

The first two seasons show he can do a pretty good job with excellent talent. This year shows that he has badly misjudged how to handle a young team. Now, maybe he learns from this, and maybe that + getting a more talented, experience team means he does okay.

But my concern is this: he obviously screwed up in a big way with whatever he did with this team to wind up THIS bad (again, not so much they're losing against this schedule as looking atrocious). So when someone makes decisions that are ultimately awful, how much do I trust their decision-making abilities in the future on other issues? That's the direction I'm going in.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.