stars FPP > RB?

[707782]

You guys missing one thing.

Full Tilt have a 600 dollars sign up bonus and have much more bonus offer to the players later on than stars.

Full tilt is the ONLY PLACE OTHER WPEX.

[kidpokeher]

I dunno about bonus. Have they even offered a reload since the UIGEA legislation passed?

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
You guys missing one thing.

Full Tilt have a 600 dollars sign up bonus and have much more bonus offer to the players later on than stars.

Full tilt is the ONLY PLACE OTHER WPEX.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ummm...yeah, that's right...no place offers as much bonus as FT.







LOL

[Soeren]

It seems that people are missing something.

It doesnt do you much good to get 35 % in rakeback. when the rake is 35 % more expensive.

I made my calculation and found out that as a platimumstar member of pokerstars. This is the cheapest place to play.

I took my pokertracker. Saw how much rake i had paid per hand (based on 50000 hands) 0,083 $/hand deducted the bonus i could get per hand (650$ bonus for 50000 fpp) and found out how much that is per hand.

This gives me the actual rake.

0,83 rake per hand
-
0,24 (bonus per hand absed on 650 $ fpp bonus)
=
0,59 $ / hand

Did the same thing with full-tilt
Rake per hand 0,97
-
bonus per hand 0 bonus are deducted from rake back right ??
-
rake back 0,26

Total 0,71

Pokerstars still was the best place to play.

This is for 2-4$ 6 max (could be different for other limits)

People who goes just for the big rakebacks is like going to differents shops to buy the exact same TV.

Shop 1
The price is 2000 $ (no discount)

Shop 2
The price is 4000 $ and you get 35 % discount/rakeback = 2600 $

Where do you buy your tv ?? but in the poker world people just dont get it.

[ImsaKidd]

[ QUOTE ]
I dunno about bonus. Have they even offered a reload since the UIGEA legislation passed?

[/ QUOTE ]

They had one last week for the 10B promo.