#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good. [/ QUOTE ] I think there is a 75%-90% chance in getting leveled here by the OP and this poster but. The point is that the only option after the bluff raise is to call, thus bluff-3bet-raising and bluff-3bet-shoving are the same thing, and both are god awful. (shoving is actually even better) Saying "the raise is bad but the call after it is great!" is just stupid. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good. [/ QUOTE ] I think there is a 75%-90% chance in getting leveled here by the OP and this poster but. The point is that the only option after the bluff raise is to call, thus bluff-3bet-raising and bluff-3bet-shoving are the same thing, and both are god awful. (shoving is actually even better) Saying "the raise is bad but the call after it is great!" is just stupid. [/ QUOTE ] i think there is a 75-90% chance you suck at NL if you think you can say the the 3-bet is terrible w/o knowing villain or history. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[X] Less than 10K hand sample wowowowowowowow
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
pwned, end of thread. [/ QUOTE ] why do you fold 75% of the time preflop |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good. [/ QUOTE ] I think there is a 75%-90% chance in getting leveled here by the OP and this poster but. The point is that the only option after the bluff raise is to call, thus bluff-3bet-raising and bluff-3bet-shoving are the same thing, and both are god awful. (shoving is actually even better) Saying "the raise is bad but the call after it is great!" is just stupid. [/ QUOTE ] i think there is a 75-90% chance you suck at NL if you think you can say the the 3-bet is terrible w/o knowing villain or history. [/ QUOTE ] risk:reward etc, its spewy as hell, apart from 3bet+calling with 34o its pretty much as bad as it gets. There is a 99%-100% chacne you suck at NL if you dont see why. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
I too like very much the bluff 3bet + "oops now we are pot committed to call a shove" play [/ QUOTE ] It does have its merits... |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
lol
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good. [/ QUOTE ] I think there is a 75%-90% chance in getting leveled here by the OP and this poster but. The point is that the only option after the bluff raise is to call, thus bluff-3bet-raising and bluff-3bet-shoving are the same thing, and both are god awful. (shoving is actually even better) Saying "the raise is bad but the call after it is great!" is just stupid. [/ QUOTE ] i think there is a 75-90% chance you suck at NL if you think you can say the the 3-bet is terrible w/o knowing villain or history. [/ QUOTE ] risk:reward etc, its spewy as hell, apart from 3bet+calling with 34o its pretty much as bad as it gets. There is a 99%-100% chacne you suck at NL if you dont see why. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Outcome: Hero wins $446. SB wins $82.60. [/ QUOTE ] |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 LOL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Lol. FD isn't saying that his bluff raise was correct, he has admitted it sucks. But after making it the call is good. [/ QUOTE ] I think there is a 75%-90% chance in getting leveled here by the OP and this poster but. The point is that the only option after the bluff raise is to call, thus bluff-3bet-raising and bluff-3bet-shoving are the same thing, and both are god awful. (shoving is actually even better) Saying "the raise is bad but the call after it is great!" is just stupid. [/ QUOTE ] i think there is a 75-90% chance you suck at NL if you think you can say the the 3-bet is terrible w/o knowing villain or history. [/ QUOTE ] risk:reward etc, its spewy as hell, apart from 3bet+calling with 34o its pretty much as bad as it gets. There is a 99%-100% chacne you suck at NL if you dont see why. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Outcome: Hero wins $446. SB wins $82.60. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] fast forward two weeks. Outcome: Hero loses $6752. BBV wins good threads. |
|
|