Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:36 AM
Bramsterdam Bramsterdam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I\'m from Holland, where the [censored] u from?
Posts: 511
Default 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

Ok, so I found this hand in my PT databse and I think (actually, I'm quite sure) I messed this hand up.

100NL, effective stacks $100, 6 handed.
Hero is in BB, Villain is in CO.

<font color="blue">Reads: don't remember my reads at that time, but villain plays 32/14/2.3/260.</font>

Pre-flop: Hero is dealt K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6 players)
UTG folds, UTG+1 and Villain limp, BTN folds, SB completes, Hero raises to $7, UTG+1 folds, Villain calls, SB folds

Flop: ($15) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players)
Hero checks, Villain bets $13.50, Hero calls.

Turn: ($42) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 players)
Hero checks, Villain bets $22.00, Hero calls

River: ($86) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 players)
Hero checks, Villain bets $56.85 and is all-in, Hero calls
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:47 AM
cjp010 cjp010 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 110
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

... Gross
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:48 AM
SilentNoise SilentNoise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: selling fire to hell
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

i typically raise a little bit more since you are oop for the rest of the hand, and theres a nice bit of dead money in the pot preflop that you wouldn't mind picking up. i raise more than 7$ here with AA aswell.

as played i think this is fine. but im station. i dont think i ever play this hand passively though because of the draws out there. and i think you are missing loads of value from 77/88/99/TT/flushdraws/straight draws.

i dont think this villain would carry on betting on the turn with a flush draw, i think its likely he will take a free card, based on his agg factor. but im not too good with interpreting those stats. is 2.3 quite agg for a person with 32vpip? but anyway i dont think he has a flush on the river. and i think he could be value betting worse.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:50 AM
Nick82 Nick82 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

I'm not sure why you raised so much pf, I realise you're OOP ( and so want to take it down pf) but seems to me you're creating an unecessarily large pot with a mediocre hand.

I make it 4.5x or 5x the bb and bet the flop to keep it straight forward. His play is far easier to read that way, deciding whether a draw is within his range etc...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:51 AM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting rivered by idiots
Posts: 6,558
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

The preflop raise is not automatic unless you are pretty sure they are going to fold because you don't want to be playing KQo OOP for a big pot.

WTF with the flop check? You got the hand you wanted, bet out on a drawish board.

After that, whatever, but you have to call the river if you're gonna play it this way.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:52 AM
chiTown22 chiTown22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 454
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

Yes you are correct. You played this hand poorly.

At least c/r the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:54 AM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

Preflop is fine. Lead flop. Hard to comment on the other streets as you c/c the flop but in this situation I'd probably fold on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:57 AM
SilentNoise SilentNoise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: selling fire to hell
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

dirty: what do you put him on to be able to fold the river? 44/QQ are both very unlikely. i dont really give 32/14s credit for fast playing a set in a headsup pot in position. and it would seem like villain would want to check behind the turn if he had a flush draw, so cant really be too worried about the flush draw. seems the only hand to be worried about is AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-21-2007, 01:31 PM
shpanko shpanko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mile High Club
Posts: 4,726
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

I like a turn crai if you're ok getting the rest of your money in on the river, if he's semi-bluffing he's not putting more money in on the river (prob) but he's probably committed to calling a shove, plus it's not like he's folding QJ/QT/Q9, I mean that would mean he has top pair! And you can't fold top pair!

I honestly don't mind the flop c/c if you have a read he likes to fire at pots. On the turn though I'm looking to get the money in.

As played call river, not that excited about it though.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-21-2007, 01:33 PM
martijn martijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: punishing minraises
Posts: 533
Default Re: 100 NL - KQ, taking a passive line

PLEASE lead flop, as played mehhhhhhh, you'll see a flush so often on the river, but also random stuff like 1010/QJ, so you really gotta call.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.