OFFICIAL share your views THREAD

[x2ski]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone who still plays at absolute poker or ultimate bet, regardless of what AP eventually admits to, is a fool.

[/ QUOTE ]

My thoughts exactly. If I played there and got my bluff called down with some U/I K9 or something I would have to wonder.

[/ QUOTE ]

I called down K8o UI against a maniac's flop check-raise a few weeks ago and was labeled a "superuser".

I've since graduated to Q-high call-downs.

This fiasco has only served to improve my game imho.

[Injection]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The one THING that everyone has been MISSING in this entire ORDEAL, is that our good FRIEND,,,,, StephenNUTS,,, has not MADE an appearance to voice his OPINION at ALL,,,,

OBVIOUSLY the investigation cannot go on WITHOUT him,,,, SO I present this TRIBUTE to him in the HOPE that he will finally SURFACE,,,

[/ QUOTE ]

bahahaha perfect

[/ QUOTE ]

I admit I'm his gimmick account [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

After I shoot up heroin, I post as Stephen.

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I must admit that the evidence I have seen thus far is underwhelming. However, after an extensive analysis, based on arbitrary assumptions, I can conclude with certainty that the odds are better of winning the lottery in six states than having the results that those accounts had. But I'm not going to come to any conclusions, because I'm a *tool* I mean, a Wizard of the Odds.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, the Wizardofodds really blew it on this one. Usually he is reliable, but his analysis here was poor.

The first line was out of context, since WoO was talking about the evidence before the tournament hand history showing the hole cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

There was plenty of evidence before the full hand history tournament came out. For him to call the evidence that potripper et al could see hole cards considering the pokertracker statistics and hand histories we did have "underwhelming" is [censored] ridiculous. These accounts were winning hundreds of big bets per hand playing with an INFINITE river aggression factor and NEVER ONCE made an incorrect play on the river, or any street for that matter. How the hell is that "underwhelming?"

[ QUOTE ]
However, he gathered evidence that the playing styles are different. That's useless. Strong evidence that not everyone plays poker the same way is incredibly weak evidence for cheating.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, again, The "wizard" of odds should clearly stick to house games, because he can't analyze poker odds worth a damn.

[ QUOTE ]
He corrected part of his analysis after feedback.

Much better analysis can be found on eGamingtoday.

[/ QUOTE ]

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still not sure why people think it's going to kill online poker when this is probably the tenth or so such scandal.

Admittedly this is bigger in actual $ terms, but in % of the market terms, I doubt it's even #1

<font color="white"> Lori </font>

[/ QUOTE ]


when else has this happened?? why is it stupid to play at UB Jman? I like it there.

[/ QUOTE ]

UB is owned by Absolute Poker.

[apefish]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i'm going to observe a lot of tables at ap in hopes of finally finding a picture of Scott Tom

[/ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
We found one... actually a few...

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm still looking. It's vitally important to the investimahgationz and in case the ones you have are like booby trapped or something.

Never know what those little monkeys will try.

[KurtSF]

Wait, are you telling me Adanthar has STILL not called the FBI?

Jesus, what's the hold up.

[Synergistic Explosions]

Why aren't we blaming the Mohawks?

[GrahamThunder]

fwiw this is a pic of scott tom

[F. McSimmons]

racist ban plz

[F. McSimmons]

WARRIORS
warriors