#81
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
I know stars has these special heads up tourneys .01 w/ .01 rebuy and its 5/10 blinds with 2k chips perfect for what we need I have the password but cannot find the tourneys anymore
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
All,
Last we sent Isura the $s and played on a random site with play chips. That's what I nominate for this. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
Just e-mail then and explain exactly what this is and what you'd like and they will help.
And if you keep getting stupid form replies from a new employee or something, just talk to Jurollo. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
[ QUOTE ]
I think you're overestimating how long it's going to take with 200xbb. That's just overpair vs overpair in a 3-bet pot + set vs OESD. Boom, presto, we're done. I think 200xbb best-of-3 on Stars is ideal and very feasible. [/ QUOTE ] agree. also, make it like $250 buyin or something, if 500 is too much. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
I think we should split the difference between the ballers and the nits: Make it $290+$10 entry and give the $10 to whoever organises the thing.
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
[ QUOTE ]
I think we should split the difference between the ballers and the nits: Make it $290+$10 entry and give the $10 to whoever organises the thing. [/ QUOTE ] I am doing it for free. There will be a bracket of 64 of $200. If interest we can do 16 or 32 of $500. So far I have 41 interested in 200+ |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
I'm down for whatever up to like $500 or so. I think the buy-in should include everyone though, not just the people who have been playing 200NL for a fair while. Keeping it to 32 looks good. 64 will be such a nightmare to organize, and I don't think we should have randoms playing atall tbh (like if most SSNL posters are like 'who are you?' I don't think you should be allowed to play).
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
I agree with Jay on 32 and keeping it to contributors...top 8 pay? 5-8 get their buyin back?
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm down for whatever up to like $500 or so. I think the buy-in should include everyone though, not just the people who have been playing 200NL for a fair while. Keeping it to 32 looks good. 64 will be such a nightmare to organize, and I don't think we should have randoms playing at all tbh (like if most SSNL posters are like 'who are you?' I don't think you should be allowed to play). [/ QUOTE ] By my calculations if you give 2 weeks for each round 64 it should take a little longer than 2 months which isn't that bad. Limiting it to 32 and not letting someone play because they are not known or have a lot of posts is kind of stupid. I know for awhile I lurked a lot and didn't post much. The only arguement I have for that is that they don't browse enough and therefore wouldn't know what is going on. But the argument to that is having a 2 week time period to play your match. If you show proof you tried to get in contact and they made no effort to try to make a match with you than something would have to be done. We could have a "board of directors" I have sent stars an email about a private HU sng so hopefully I can hear back from them soon and I can make the official thread. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SSNL HU Tourney?
GSy,
Slow down, no one asked you to organise the tournament on behalf of SSNL. Please let a mod approve or deny you as director. Isura organised the last one and hasn't chimed in yet. |
|
|