|
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2007, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
There will never be a Woods or Federer of poker because the variance plays such a roll. If anything the evolution of the game will make it harder for someone to dominate. [/ QUOTE ] Over the last five years (enough hands to at least somewhat discount variance), a player with all of the technical skills, Chris Ferguson, Ph.D., is the best player at the WSOP. 
|
|
#2
11-26-2007, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Life Cycle of a Poker Player (and my thoughts on live vs onlin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] There will never be a Woods or Federer of poker because the variance plays such a roll. If anything the evolution of the game will make it harder for someone to dominate. [/ QUOTE ] Over the last five years (enough hands to at least somewhat discount variance), a player with all of the technical skills, Chris Ferguson, Ph.D., is the best player at the WSOP. [/ QUOTE ] This isn't even anywhere close to enough to discount variance. Its what like 200 tournaments at most?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
