Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:11 PM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,449
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm definitely up for being convinced on the 17/14 nit thing.
I think such a player's 3betting range in this situation is 99+, AJ+.


[/ QUOTE ]


In this situation? Where we open utg for 6xbb?

This seems like exactly the same range you would give this guy for raising your button steal when he is in bb.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:17 PM
mdkrahn mdkrahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 868
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

I definitely didn't factor in the 6xbb 3betting range here.

but I think a 17/14 is essentially playing raise/fold preflop, and I doubt he's folding 99's here.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:20 PM
martijn martijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: punishing minraises
Posts: 533
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

erm, 17/14's reraise range on these limits generally are QQ/AK, maybe JJ.

just fold preflop and dont get in situations like this.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:22 PM
_TKO_ _TKO_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,160
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

I think I'd call preflop, but when posting the hand, I'd cut it off at the preflop decision.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:23 PM
Casper05 Casper05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,566
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]
If you misclicked a 6x UTG raise and a nit 3 bet you from the CO, you should be insta-mucking JJ IMO. I think you'd have to have some great post-flop reads on the guy to call profitably.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this

My questions:
1) Will villain ever fold QQ if we push the flop?

2) This villain won't with our history, but without that, if he folds QQ isn't a push +EV (since he also folds AK)?

3) ...or is he rarely c-betting AK?

4) Who c-bets AK on a low flop with this action? I prob check/bet 50/50.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:28 PM
BHold BHold is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 83
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

I often play at about 17/14. However, I can promise you I'd be very happy if everyone folded JJ to my 3bets. At 17/14 you can find players that do indeed only 3bet qq+/ak, or players that 3bet 77+, aj+, kq with regularity and the occasional SC. This hand really depends entirely on how this player has played thus far preflop. Whether you fold preflop or stick it in on the flop I think the EV is very very close.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:28 PM
Redgrape Redgrape is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 816
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]
with that range, 4bet >>> calling.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why so your mistake is even more amplified????

The second retarded post you made; the first was the one about how youll cbet AK 100% now. Yeah, that's because the other hands u could have there is AA-QQ.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:32 PM
Austiger Austiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you misclicked a 6x UTG raise and a nit 3 bet you from the CO, you should be insta-mucking JJ IMO. I think you'd have to have some great post-flop reads on the guy to call profitably.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this

My questions:
1) Will villain ever fold QQ if we push the flop?

2) This villain won't with our history, but without that, if he folds QQ isn't a push +EV (since he also folds AK)?

3) ...or is he rarely c-betting AK?

4) Who c-bets AK on a low flop with this action? I prob check/bet 50/50.

[/ QUOTE ]

If a good portion of your profit is coming from getting a PF 3-banger to fold QQ on a rag flop, I think you know how that will turn out. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

As for c-betting re-raised pots, I am guilty of doing it nearly 100% and it's a bad leak for me. In position though, I do think I would bet here.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:36 PM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm definitely up for being convinced on the 17/14 nit thing.
I think such a player's 3betting range in this situation is 99+, AJ+.
In which case, I think folding preflop is really bad right?

But I guess if you put his range as much tighter then that,
then obviously folding would be best.

[/ QUOTE ]

For comparison, i play > 25/20 and I'd say my 3betting range here is probably AQ+, JJ+. I probably flat call AQ a lot actually now that I think about it. But I suppose a lot of players would mindlessly 3 bet 99 because "it's a good hand!" I dunno, but I'm more aware of what I'm trying to accomplish when I make certain plays, and I can't think of any good reason to 3bet 99 vs an UTG raise from somebody solid, but that's just me. And I also flat call more in position than most players which makes me more comfortable in not reraising them.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-09-2007, 05:50 PM
mdkrahn mdkrahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 868
Default Re: Jacks in a really tough spot.

[ QUOTE ]

For comparison, i play > 25/20 and I'd say my 3betting range here is probably AQ+, JJ+. I probably flat call AQ a lot actually now that I think about it. But I suppose a lot of players would mindlessly 3 bet 99 because "it's a good hand!" I dunno, but I'm more aware of what I'm trying to accomplish when I make certain plays, and I can't think of any good reason to 3bet 99 vs an UTG raise from somebody solid, but that's just me. And I also flat call more in position than most players which makes me more comfortable in not reraising them.

[/ QUOTE ]

fair enough.
and I do agree on coldcalling vs 3betting with a hand like 99's vs a standard villain opening UTG.
Maybe I'm just biasing my opinion on the times where I have seen bad 17/14 TAGS playing mindlessly, myself included sometimes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.