|
|
#1
11-01-2007, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
More levels or more time?
Which would you prefer, and why? Or does it not matter.
The rounds before and after are the same in both instances. The 25/50 level is round 4. First 3 rounds are 5/10, 10/20, 15/30. Any other info needed? Scenario 1: Blinds Time 25/50 20 min 50/100 20 min 75/150 20 min 100/200 20 min 150/300 20 min 200/400 20 min Scenario 2: Blinds Time 25/50 30 min 50/100 30 min 100/200 30 min 200/400 30 min 
|
|
#2
11-01-2007, 04:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More levels or more time?
[ QUOTE ]
Blinds Time 25/50 20 min 50/100 20 min 75/150 20 min 100/200 20 min 150/300 20 min 200/400 20 min Scenario 2: Blinds Time 25/50 30 min 50/100 30 min 100/200 30 min 200/400 30 min [/ QUOTE ] The second- I have 10 more minutes at a lower blind than 200/400, when presumably the average M is low. If, however, players will let themselves be blinded off if they don't pay attention, give me the first structure instead.
|
|
#3
11-01-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More levels or more time?
I'm assuming same stack sizes for both structures.
With inexperienced villains, definitely 1st, quality villians the 2nd.
|
|
#4
11-01-2007, 06:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More levels or more time?
The second one is a slower structure. The BB averages 75 for the first hour while in the first one, the BB averages 100 for the first hour.
|
|
#5
11-02-2007, 03:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More levels or more time?
more levels definately
|
|
#6
11-02-2007, 12:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: More levels or more time?
LotteryLarry said,
The second- I have 10 more minutes at a lower blind than 200/400, when presumably the average M is low. [ QUOTE ] The second one is a slower structure. The BB averages 75 for the first hour while in the first one, the BB averages 100 for the first hour. [/ QUOTE ] Both of you guys are correct but what if we just say that you post blinds every 25 minutes, so at :25, :50 and :75 (1:15) In this case it costs you more under scenario 1 than scenario 2, 675 vs. 525. Thats pretty significant. It works out this way under several other examples also, maybe not as extreme though. Scenario 1 starts costing you more in the middle of this range so when you do get to the 200/400 level you actually have less. Scenario 2 costs more at the end, where I believe it will end up costing you slightly more. Wouldn't you want to preserve your chips / stack / playing ability for as long as possible? If so I would think Scenario 2 would be a better choice? Edit: After rereading the posts I think we're all in agreement?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
