|
View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
Yes | 7 | 16.28% | |
No | 14 | 32.56% | |
No, but my significant other does | 0 | 0% | |
No, but I'd consider it | 4 | 9.30% | |
Tanning is gay, dude | 18 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW most people are saying go back to Part structure because the SNGs were so much softer back then. The structure wasn't the reason they were so soft, it was more the players and possibly the fact that they were 10 handed. Another thing you could consider is increasing the starting chips to 1750 or 2000, which might work. [/ QUOTE ] The main reason I think people want the Party structure is because it effectively ends stalling. At least this is my reason. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
- Keep The Ante
- More Sng turbo 6 players |
|
|