Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 08-02-2007, 07:23 PM
m3dude m3dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


a 4 bet there doesnt mean aa/kk. it could be a pure steal, ak, aa kk qq jj tt etc. so while he could have tt or 88, is he check raising with those? this is why i said folding has to be CONSIDERED. i never stated the play i believe is correct here. if he leads into you you also have a tough decision, a decision in which spr should not the the primary factor

[/ QUOTE ]

if he leads, SPR wouldn't be the primary factor, because you haven't decided to commit yet. with KK there, things such as: a) an A on the flop or b) a solid opponent making a strong lead, would certainly justify deciding not to commit, despite having created an ideal SPR situation preflop.

but once you bet, or raise, or even call a big bet on this flop, putting in > 30% of your stack, you're never going to fold. you've created an ideal SPR situation preflop, decided the flop and action dictated committing, and committed yourself with a big bet. you're not folding now.

[/ QUOTE ]

this thinking will just cost you money
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 08-02-2007, 07:27 PM
facepull facepull is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 169
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

isnt that what poker was always about? to play against bad players? to seek out the best games? what has happened to those ideals? i could care less about playing against other good players or even great players. all i want is the bad players.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 08-02-2007, 07:36 PM
m3dude m3dude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

id like to be able to beat both
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 08-02-2007, 07:46 PM
ryanj247 ryanj247 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 458
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

but once you bet, or raise, or even call a big bet on this flop, putting in > 30% of your stack, you're never going to fold. you've created an ideal SPR situation preflop, decided the flop and action dictated committing, and committed yourself with a big bet. you're not folding now.

[/ QUOTE ]

this thinking will just cost you money

[/ QUOTE ]

this reply makes it clear you're just trolling here. not sure why you would choose this thread to troll, but whatever.

moving along...
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:11 PM
tightymcfish tightymcfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

but once you bet, or raise, or even call a big bet on this flop, putting in > 30% of your stack, you're never going to fold. you've created an ideal SPR situation preflop, decided the flop and action dictated committing, and committed yourself with a big bet. you're not folding now.

[/ QUOTE ]

this thinking will just cost you money

[/ QUOTE ]

this reply makes it clear you're just trolling here. not sure why you would choose this thread to troll, but whatever.

moving along...

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, if you keep thinking omg I put 60% of my stack I have an overpair I have to call then you are missing the point.
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:13 PM
tightymcfish tightymcfish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

Matt I have a question about SPR for you. You are advocating to play suited connectors,gappers you need a SPR of 10 and up. In your chart on page 216 you have that in a 100bb game which most games are, you should fold getting 4 calllers on the button for a 7bb raise because the SPR is 2.7???
So in a regular live 1/2 donkfest with 100bb effective stacks you fold 87sooted to a 14 dollar raise? Please explain as this just seems wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:35 PM
ryanj247 ryanj247 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 458
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]

Seriously, if you keep thinking omg I put 60% of my stack I have an overpair I have to call then you are missing the point.

[/ QUOTE ]

if i put 60% of my stack in w/ an overpair, it was because i *wanted* to call and *planned* to call if i got raised all-in.
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:42 PM
Jeff76 Jeff76 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,268
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
and when u have no outs(2), how much you have invested isnt as important as your equity v villians likely range aside from calculating odds on your call

[/ QUOTE ]Well, right- the odds on your call is exactly why that fact that you've put half your stack in is important. Any time you've put half your effective stack in the pot you are getting 3:1 on your money, which means villain's range has to be VERY tight for this to be a fold (as in, he never plays QQ or anything worse like this).

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

130,680 games 0.010 secs 13,068,000 games/sec

Board: Ts 8d 3h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 32.741% 30.47% 02.27% 39816 2970.00 { KK }
Hand 1: 67.259% 64.99% 02.27% 84924 2970.00 { QQ+, TT, 88, 33 }

I haven't read the book yet (still eagerly awaiting), but this point seems pretty clear to me.
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 08-02-2007, 09:40 PM
Humble Pie Humble Pie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,036
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

I have a question about 'Sup Bro'. In the first orbit examples at the end of the book the muscle-bound 20-something with a pink shirt and popped collar, is this a reference to the legendary 2+2 poster who was an all-county linebacker in H.S. and had 17 tackles for losses?
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:16 AM
feelixthegreek feelixthegreek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 9th Ward
Posts: 590
Default Re: Professional No-Limit Hold \'em Volume 1 Review Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Matt I have a question about SPR for you. You are advocating to play suited connectors,gappers you need a SPR of 10 and up. In your chart on page 216 you have that in a 100bb game which most games are, you should fold getting 4 calllers on the button for a 7bb raise because the SPR is 2.7???
So in a regular live 1/2 donkfest with 100bb effective stacks you fold 87sooted to a 14 dollar raise? Please explain as this just seems wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

From playing in these kinds of 1/2 games, I've realized at the 100BB level that hands like these have very little fold equity, so flopping draws usually equates to racing with whoever flopped top pair.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.