|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: which handle should i use 4 stars? | |||
| lolbbvaments |
   
|
7 | 10.77% |
| mike oxinyermom |
  
|
3 | 4.62% |
| sirpwnsalot |
  
|
8 | 12.31% |
| kneegroplz |
  
|
15 | 23.08% |
| good4me2poopon |
  
|
6 | 9.23% |
| BASTARD! FACK OOT! |
  
|
26 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#831
10-25-2007, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
Wow. I can't imagine what would lead anyone to write that. Was this for limit or NL? Not that it matters, but in deepstack NL implied odds mean you can call with whatever schmutz you can think of if you can get your opponent's stack when you hit. But you can also open with lots of garbage.
|
|
#832
10-25-2007, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Wow. I can't imagine what would lead anyone to write that. Was this for limit or NL? Not that it matters, but in deepstack NL implied odds mean you can call with whatever schmutz you can think of if you can get your opponent's stack when you hit. But you can also open with lots of garbage. [/ QUOTE ] Midstakes limit. This in the middle of a debate on what to do with AJo from SB against a late position open-raise. There's some "raise or fold" in the mix, too... |
|
#833
10-25-2007, 04:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wow. I can't imagine what would lead anyone to write that. Was this for limit or NL? Not that it matters, but in deepstack NL implied odds mean you can call with whatever schmutz you can think of if you can get your opponent's stack when you hit. But you can also open with lots of garbage. [/ QUOTE ] Midstakes limit. This in the middle of a debate on what to do with AJo from SB against a late position open-raise. There's some "raise or fold" in the mix, too... [/ QUOTE ] Wow, that is an amazing thread. I wanted to respond so bad, but then I just laid off. No need to meddle with fire. |
|
#834
10-25-2007, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow. I can't imagine what would lead anyone to write that. Was this for limit or NL? Not that it matters, but in deepstack NL implied odds mean you can call with whatever schmutz you can think of if you can get your opponent's stack when you hit. But you can also open with lots of garbage. [/ QUOTE ] Midstakes limit. This in the middle of a debate on what to do with AJo from SB against a late position open-raise. There's some "raise or fold" in the mix, too... [/ QUOTE ] Wow, that is an amazing thread. I wanted to respond so bad, but then I just laid off. No need to meddle with fire. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think there's any fire there. It is fizzling out because the guy making the claim isn't going to check his own work. |
|
#835
10-25-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow. I can't imagine what would lead anyone to write that. Was this for limit or NL? Not that it matters, but in deepstack NL implied odds mean you can call with whatever schmutz you can think of if you can get your opponent's stack when you hit. But you can also open with lots of garbage. [/ QUOTE ] Midstakes limit. This in the middle of a debate on what to do with AJo from SB against a late position open-raise. There's some "raise or fold" in the mix, too... [/ QUOTE ] Wow, that is an amazing thread. I wanted to respond so bad, but then I just laid off. No need to meddle with fire. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think there's any fire there. It is fizzling out because the guy making the claim isn't going to check his own work. [/ QUOTE ] well I replied to one of his later posts anyhow... |
|
#836
10-25-2007, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
Bravos I think BBV wants you to respond to this
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=4&vc=1 |
|
#837
10-25-2007, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Bravos I think BBV wants you to respond to this http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=4&vc=1 [/ QUOTE ] I already did [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] PS - I still haven't accepted any mobnies yet LOL |
|
#839
10-25-2007, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] grudgematch !!!! [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
gogogogogo |
|
#840
10-25-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Rumor has it that there might be a $1.47 match brewing... PointBlank - bellatrix [/ QUOTE ] Sunday Sunday Sunday! Point Bland vs. Dominellatrix! One man AND one woman enter! One man OR one woman leaves! |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
