#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100....do you like this river decision
my decision was to NOT value bet
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Button ($39.80) SB ($57.05) BB ($244.25) UTG ($218.90) UTG+1 ($103.15) MP1 ($240.05) MP2 ($114.90) MP3 ($98.50) Hero ($98) Preflop: Hero is CO with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls $3. Flop: ($8.50) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $6</font>, BB calls $6. Turn: ($20.50) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $16</font>, BB calls $16. River: ($52.50) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> BB checks, Hero checks. Final Pot: $52.50 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
Why didn't you bet? What was your reasoning?
Edit: I think this seems like a prefect spot for a value bet. There are plausible hands that can call that you beat. You just have to be able to fold to a rr on the off chance that villian has the nuts (I don't see people check/raise he river much though...they probably would have raised the turn) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
Its probably a spot I bet like almost always. You will obviously fold a lot of flush draws that wiffed but some aces or other pairs will also call. I think that Q9 is the only hand you could be afraid of in this situation. If I was villian then I'm c/r Q9 here, but you can't be afraid of one hand. Too much missed value from other possible hands.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
depends on the villain
verse loose-passives, I fire away again Against nitty players with low WTSD and high W$SD, I just check. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
here is my range for him:
1. i didnt put him on an ace because he called flop(i realize many players call anyway). 2. I didn't put him middle pair or something because he is calling my huge double barrel. i figured he either has a missed draw, a set he has been slowplaying, or a Q9. I see no reason to bet against any of those on the river. thoughts? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
[ QUOTE ]
i figured he either has a missed draw, a set he has been slowplaying, or a Q9. I see no reason to bet against any of those on the river. [/ QUOTE ] Any reads on villain? Particularly his aggression? Would he reraise you on the flop with JT or a set? If you're worried that he's drawn out on you, I'd be a lot more concerned about KQ, particularly KQ[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. However, I would have expected him to make some kind of a bet by now with the nuts or on the flop with a big combo draw unless he's really passive. I'm a little ambivalent about value betting the river, without a read - If he's a calling station then I'd value bet him for sure, looking for calls from QJ/KJ/JT/J9/AK/AQ, hell 99 or some junk Ace wouldn't surprise me. But if he's a decent player there's not a lot of hands he's going to call a third barrel with that you beat - JT, AK/AQ, maybe a weaker Ace if he's having a bad day... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
Read dependent. If you are LAGish then value bet. If villain is CS then value bet. If villain is a slowplayer then check behind.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
[ QUOTE ]
here is my range for him: 1. i didnt put him on an ace because he called flop(i realize many players call anyway). 2. I didn't put him middle pair or something because he is calling my huge double barrel. i figured he either has a missed draw, a set he has been slowplaying, or a Q9. I see no reason to bet against any of those on the river. thoughts? [/ QUOTE ] It's a balancing act. He will either fold those missed draws, call and lose with one pair or two pair hands, call and win (very very unlikely, maybe AJ or a set if he's weak-tight) or c/r you with a str8, in which case you HAVE to fold. With this board I think there are enough ways that he can call and lose that it outweighs the possibility of getting c/r. And I don't think most players at this level are tricky enough to c/r the river on a bluff. I don't even think many would chcek every street to set up a river c/r. Some, yes, but not many. There's no shame in value betting the river and then folding if making that value bet will make you money in the long term. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100....do you like this river decision
vnh, I should learn to do this.
Does the fact that we are holding the A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] changes anything ? I mean if we have for exemple A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]X[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] would be a possible holding for him that could call a river bet (in particular A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]/A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]/A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]/A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]). |
|
|