BB/100

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
6

[/ QUOTE ]

6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling.

[/ QUOTE ]

12 tabling seems like a bad idea. Also, I have 5.7ptbb over 100k hands w/n lsat 4 months. 6 is def doable

[/ QUOTE ]

12 tabling is where it's @!!! No, seriously though, maybe I'm more concerned w/ my hourly than my ptbb/100, idk if that's a good thing/bad thing, whatever.... I honestly thought most everyone who was playing for a living in midstakes was playing 10+ tables. I stand corrected

[/ QUOTE ]

you're a [censored] beast though dude to play the way you do on 12 tables. i cant go over 8 at 2/4 and at 5/10 i will only play more than 6 if aquama is playing more than 6

[mce86]

[ QUOTE ]
1) I want to see a 450K sample of someone running at 6ptbb 10 tabling or it's not possible.
2) people move up before then
3) is it possible though?
4) yeah, I'll bet you I could do it.
5) ok I'll need an escrow, and it would have to be big enough to be worth my while
6) f that. Who cares.

[/ QUOTE ]
if u were winning that good, youd move up way before 400K hands

[nuggetz87]

same fdoc, i can play 8 when i'm comfortable with the game and 6 if not.

[KingDan]

multitabling is played out, playing 4 or less tables and just [censored] on people is where its at now.

[G_Dollaz]

[ QUOTE ]
multitabling is played out, playing 4 or less tables and just [censored] on people is where its at now.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, no. I'd much rather 12 table and run @ 4 than 4 table and run @ 7, at least @ my level....

[jfish]

i wish i was able to 12 table at 4ptbb, thats sick.

[DJ Sensei]

hunting gambler-whales on a few tables of 10/20+ is wayyy better than multitable grinding msnl against 4 2+2 TAGLAG clones and 1 30/8/1 "fish". winrate is better, too, but it'll mainly make you enjoy life more.

[KeanuReaver]

i wish i was able to 12 table period
i play 4 tables and my career winrate NL200+ is 6ptbb/100. thats only over around 150k hands though, i moved to NL not that long ago

[G_Dollaz]

[ QUOTE ]
hunting gambler-whales on a few tables of 10/20+ is wayyy better than multitable grinding msnl against 4 2+2 TAGLAG clones and 1 30/8/1 "fish". winrate is better, too, but it'll mainly make you enjoy life more.

[/ QUOTE ]


Ok, here's my thinking on it: I have the same amount of money in play if I'm 12 tabling the 2/4 or if I'm 2-3 tabling the 10/20. The caliber of player @ the 2/4 is much lower than it is @ the 10/20. 12 tabling the 2/4 the long run gets here much faster than it would playing maybe what, 20k hands/month @ the 10/20? I don't forsee running above 4ptbb/100 @ the 10/20+ certainly. Don't get me wrong, I respect your opinion a great deal as a poster here which is why I'm trying to figure out where I'm wrong. If I was beating the 25/50 it'd be a different story, but I just feel as if playing so few hands would lead to a # of breakeven months along the way, no? I mean even w/ a 3.5-4ptbb/100 winrate over a large sample (hundreds of thousands of hands) I've gone on MANY 20k hand breakeven stretches along the way.

That being said, I'm going on vacation for the next 11 days and will only have my laptop, so I'll be 6 tabling the 3/6 and the 5/10 here and there, we'll see how that works out. Maybe I'll run good, move up, and then I'll be the whale @ the 10/20 and you'l get to take all my money, lol.

[KeanuReaver]

i dunno
i've seen some pretty awful 10/20 tables