Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:02 AM
uter uter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 178
Default is locking every thread really the way to go? (NVG Discussion Thread)

the benyamine one really caught my eye -
benyamine is the epitome of the high stakes player with game selection and ego problems, and i think the fact that he has finally dropped to 1-2 and 2-4 [hund] to woodshed his game is a subject ppl might feel like discussing.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:03 AM
mookboi mookboi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fitty NL
Posts: 814
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

Why can't they discuss it in the numerous threads about Benyamine in the past couple of days?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:04 AM
EWS87 EWS87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

i was thinking the Benyamine one was close but i strongly agreed with every other thread that was locked...definitely a step in the right direction and im sure this board will get better very soon if it keeps up
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:06 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,160
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

[ QUOTE ]
the benyamine one really caught my eye -
benyamine is the epitome of the high stakes player with game selection and ego problems, and i think the fact that he has finally dropped to 1-2 and 2-4 [hund] to woodshed his game is a subject ppl might feel like discussing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Benyamine threads are fine except we don't need a new thread every time a pro/online pro (about whome there are a dozen other threads) does something minor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:07 AM
uter uter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 178
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

the obvious answer if it were actually feasible would be to eyeball test individual user's posts and either ban or limit all the retards but i guess thats not feasible for the time it would take
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:10 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

you locked my thread when i was talking about daniel N (ie - my only weakness is hungry and sleepy) not daniel negreanu.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:15 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,160
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

[ QUOTE ]
you locked my thread when i was talking about daniel N (ie - my only weakness is hungry and sleepy) not daniel negreanu.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I did.
Maybe if you had included a link in your OP it would have been ok. But it was going nowhere and "cluttering" the main page.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:17 AM
EWS87 EWS87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,188
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

jman220 for mod imo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:20 AM
Bipolar00 Bipolar00 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: stuck inside my head
Posts: 89
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go? *DELETED*

Post deleted by jman220
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-16-2007, 12:38 AM
0524432 0524432 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 461
Default Re: is locking every thread really the way to go?

gg Jman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.