#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
Jam,
You never see k,6 3 bet here? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
Jam, You never see k,6 3 bet here? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but it's vanishingly rare. Maybe it's more likely at 100NL, but the guy has to be an drooler and very aggressive. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
Fistpump all-in.
Jamo, you missed 45 in the range. And 62 as well. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
Fistpump all-in. Jamo, you missed 45 in the range. And 62 as well. [/ QUOTE ] we have 50% equity with another 62 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] the odds of 45 playing like this are just not enough to shove. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
You expect a 44/2 player to fold 45 just because the board is paired..?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
I disagree. I totally see a 40%vpip playing 45 like this. Why would he not?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
I'm not sure if you are replying to me or Caterp, but that was my point, it's teh nuts to him, even with a paired board.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
It says Re: CAterp.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl FH in limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
raising turn is meh [/ QUOTE ] What's wrong with a turn raise? I like a turn raise to extract a bit from the guy who checked his A on the flop. As played, I just call river. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: El Diablo
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree. I totally see a 40%vpip playing 45 like this. Why would he not? [/ QUOTE ] Because, in practise, they don't. River 3-bets are enormously strong. edit: especially with 0.5 AF |
|
|