|
|
#32
10-18-2007, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory
claunch,
why? i doubt our ranges will be so narrowed and face up when we check. plenty of regs will also bluff to a check in rr-ed pots. plus, we shouldnt be betting 100% of the time anyways. 
|
|
#33
10-18-2007, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
Jesus, you guys 3-bet a lot. I think I'm more likely to fold a lot of those hands than 3-bet them. Food for thought for me.
|
|
#34
10-18-2007, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] no i will not be exploited at 1/2 [/ QUOTE ] If you're not comfortable playing extremely exploitably against almost all of the 1/2 regs, move up to where they respect your raises or something. [/ QUOTE ] Huh, I don't get your post? Normally you're NEVER sarcastic, so I don't really get it. I'm saying that people at 1/2 aren't good enough to exploit me if I'm 3 betting OOP with marginals a lot. So, you're saying I should move up to where they fold too much? They do that now fwiw. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#35
10-18-2007, 03:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
[ QUOTE ]
claunch, why? i doubt our ranges will be so narrowed and face up when we check. plenty of regs will also bluff to a check in rr-ed pots. plus, we shouldnt be betting 100% of the time anyways. [/ QUOTE ] Well, yeah, checking is fine sometimes as long as you c/f a fair amount of the time when you miss. I just saw more than one response that had the default action of c-betting every flop they miss and checking when they hit, which is just dumb. Something vaguely close to a good frequency would be c/f the missed hands like 40% or so (more often on non-A-hi flops imo), c-betting the other 60%. Mostly c/cing Ax, occassionally b/cing against a trickier/more aggro reg. Almost always leading with 88. Also, what ikes said, it's totally possible/often-preferable to call and do something postflop to win the hand.
|
|
#36
10-18-2007, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
I have no idea how to quote, but jesus I want to quote ike right now. Christ almighty what do you guys NOT 3 bet oop. LEARN HOW TO CALLLLLLLLLLLLL
|
|
#38
10-18-2007, 03:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
Texan
|
|
#40
10-18-2007, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Theory
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] no i will not be exploited at 1/2 [/ QUOTE ] If you're not comfortable playing extremely exploitably against almost all of the 1/2 regs, move up to where they respect your raises or something. [/ QUOTE ] Huh, I don't get your post? Normally you're NEVER sarcastic, so I don't really get it. I'm saying that people at 1/2 aren't good enough to exploit me if I'm 3 betting OOP with marginals a lot. So, you're saying I should move up to where they fold too much? They do that now fwiw. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Oh.. I thought you were saying you were trying to be unexploitable by betting almost every hand in your range on that flop--which is def the unexploitable play given your pf range vs. the caller's pf range. You should be checking Ax on that flop.. not close.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
