#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
king of drafts,
why can't omgca have a hand that contains a ten, or a 9, or a pocket pair? similarly i don't see why he can't have a 4 sometimes, though that would be less understandable i think. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
why can't omgca have a hand that contains a ten, or a 9, or a pocket pair? [/ QUOTE ] Because he would check those behind most of the time because he has showdown value? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
Q5 call wasn't THAT amazing. OMGCA has an ace or a missed draw, that's pretty much it. Edit: the bar for sick calls was set pretty high when durrrr called 100k vs antonius with 9x on a board of like AQ9xx [/ QUOTE ] How is it sick to call with a full house? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] why can't omgca have a hand that contains a ten, or a 9, or a pocket pair? [/ QUOTE ] Because he would check those behind most of the time because he has showdown value? [/ QUOTE ] there's no "thin" value in 300/600 hu? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
Edit: the bar for sick calls was set pretty high when durrrr called 100k vs antonius with 9x on a board of like AQ9xx [/ QUOTE ] I don't see anything great with this call. He has x's full of nines. Am I missing something? |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] why can't omgca have a hand that contains a ten, or a 9, or a pocket pair? [/ QUOTE ] Because he would check those behind most of the time because he has showdown value? [/ QUOTE ] there's no "thin" value in 300/600 hu? [/ QUOTE ] There is "thin" and then there is retarded. I think if Jman "value-bets" a T or 9 there he's getting called by a better hand more than half the time (JJ+, Ax). I don't play high stakes though, so I might be totally off... |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Edit: the bar for sick calls was set pretty high when durrrr called 100k vs antonius with 9x on a board of like AQ9xx [/ QUOTE ] I don't see anything great with this call. He has x's full of nines. Am I missing something? [/ QUOTE ] yes you are |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] why can't omgca have a hand that contains a ten, or a 9, or a pocket pair? [/ QUOTE ] Because he would check those behind most of the time because he has showdown value? [/ QUOTE ] there's no "thin" value in 300/600 hu? [/ QUOTE ] There is "thin" and then there is retarded. I think if Jman "value-bets" a T or 9 there he's getting called by a better hand more than half the time (JJ+, Ax). I don't play high stakes though, so I might be totally off... [/ QUOTE ] well it looks like he's getting called by a 5 now doesn't it smarty pants |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Q5 call wasn't THAT amazing. OMGCA has an ace or a missed draw, that's pretty much it. Edit: the bar for sick calls was set pretty high when durrrr called 100k vs antonius with 9x on a board of like AQ9xx [/ QUOTE ] How is it sick to call with a full house? [/ QUOTE ] zeebo theorem --> instacall |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OMGCLAYAIKEN vs. LarsLuzak 2 table 300-600 HU GOGOGOGOGOGOGOGGOg
I'm just saying he's an underdog against Lars' calling range if he vb's a T or 9. Feel free to disagree.
|
|
|