Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-01-2007, 02:14 PM
Little John Little John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,843
Default $60 L3 vs regular bvb

vilian is a tight regular and knows me pretty well. everytime i showdown vs this guy L1-L3 it seems we each have a monster. i'm talking set/boat/quad/nuts monster, so i am expecting extra respect from him...

also, i would typically c-bet the flop, i just got distracted and hit the check button.

so do you like a c-bet here? and as played with the misclick, CR ok?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Hero (t1550)
BB (t1650)
UTG (t3035)
UTG+1 (t1440)
MP1 (t1725)
MP2 (t1410)
CO (t325)
Button (t2365)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t150</font>, BB calls t100.

Flop: (t300) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets t250</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t500</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2007, 03:31 PM
sbj sbj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 258
Default Re: $60 L3 vs regular bvb

Given your read and the misclick I think I fold. But if you are going to raise I think you need to raise more, which given your stack size essentially requires a push.
With your bet size, Villian needs to call 250 with 1050 in the pot. Even if only has two over cards, he is justified in calling.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2007, 04:02 PM
Alex_Rules Alex_Rules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 80
Default Re: $60 L3 vs regular bvb

yeah min raise is gross and looks fishy, if he knows you are a regular he knows you don't min raise when you actually have something (and if you do you might have a leak). I think a shove is an alright play, especially if you think he will fold JQ or JK, but as played I probably fold. C-bet makes sense, then fold c/f if he plays back.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2007, 04:06 PM
MikeMcQ1 MikeMcQ1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Central Fla.
Posts: 2,534
Default Re: $60 L3 vs regular bvb

The only thing about a check/raise here is that he will never be folding a better hand. PF you would have been raised if he had a better hand I would think, barring a monster. So I would c-bet here everytime.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2007, 02:07 AM
Scotty_12 Scotty_12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoxpoker Coach
Posts: 1,282
Default Re: $60 L3 vs regular bvb

I like a cbet here, and after the misclick I think it needs to be a muck. Even raising the minimum costs you 500 more to win 550 when he is cbet bluffing, and as said before he has the right price to call with two overs if you do that. When you shove he can play perfectly, and I really doubt you fold anything you beat outside of 99/TT and maybe something wacky like JT/JQs, and he may look you up anyway
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2007, 02:12 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: $60 L3 vs regular bvb

Just c/c once you misclick.
He won't two barrel that much but will always bet like KQ and stuff and he wll check back like 99 and tt.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.