|
|
#61
06-06-2007, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Collusion on FTP?
well it seems to me that if I have the nut flush draw and say bottom pair and nothing else, I might jam against a (probable) top set, given the dead money and some fold equity if the guy doesn't have top set
if two of my buddies at the table showed me their cards and they had none of my suit in their 8 cards, and they had 4 pair cards (matching the board) in their hands. http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2753027 30% equity http://twodimes.net/h/?z=2753059 40% equity maybe not the best example but you see the point. 
|
|
#62
06-06-2007, 06:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collusion on FTP?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ike, I don't get your point. You're saying it doesn't happen, or something? [/ QUOTE ] i'm saying the reason you are losing isn't because you saw two people colluding once [/ QUOTE ] Why you ridin my nuts, boy?
|
|
#63
06-06-2007, 11:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collusion on FTP?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ike, I don't get your point. You're saying it doesn't happen, or something? [/ QUOTE ] i'm saying the reason you are losing isn't because you saw two people colluding once [/ QUOTE ] I think you've well and truly missed the point of Wazz's post.
|
|
#64
06-09-2007, 05:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collusion on FTP?
[ QUOTE ]
lol wazz, you list not winning , fish calling your bluffs, FTP didn't respond to your email w/o screen names or examples, something about a western club as evidence of collusion?? did you ever suppose that you just suck at poker? [/ QUOTE ] lol, you take a slimy cheapshot at the remotest opportunity, you continue to take further digs at a respected poster, you doubt someone's sincerity probably because it's something you deeply lack yourself. did you ever suppose that your attitude sucks?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
