Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 09:11 PM
VVVVVV VVVVVV is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
Default Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

Confused on how to use odds. Let's say I flopped the nut flush draw, giving me 9 outs and 4:1 odds against. My opponent has $12 stack and I have him covered. He bets $2 into a $2 pot. Do I use the pot odds $4 pot, $2 to call, 2:1 or do I use $4 pot plus $10 stack behind, 7:1 to make my decision? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2007, 09:33 PM
RyverRat RyverRat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 153
Default Re: Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

depends if you really think he will put in that $10 behind.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:46 PM
basementproject basementproject is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 515
Default Re: Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

As Ryver said, you have to assess how much you think villain will put in the pot on future streets, and compare that amount to the odds you get ATM to play and make your hand.

Just adding his stack size to the equation isn't correct, and could get you into a lot of trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2007, 12:50 AM
2p2J 2p2J is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 185
Default Re: Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

From what I'm learning about this is that if your odds to make your hand are 4:1 at the moment and your getting for example 3.5:1 or somewhere in that range you can call the bet without sufficient odds (4:1 to make it a +EV call). This is based on folding the next street if you miss your draw and means you don't put anymore money in the pot. I'm sure this is not exactly right and someone else can explain it in better terms.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:41 AM
VVVVVV VVVVVV is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 32
Default Re: Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

What I have been doing is looking at how much my opponent has already committed to the pot. If he has committed less than 1/3 third of his stack, I'll look at the present pot odds. If he has already committed more than 1/3 of his stack, I'll look at his stack size, figuring he is likely to play for the entire stack. Does this logic make sense?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2007, 08:59 AM
rodders133 rodders133 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: Pot Odds vs Implied Odds

The thing about implied odds is how hidden your hand is. A flush is probably the most unhidden hand there is, so even if you hit on the turn, you are not likely to get their stack, and a call from you hints you are on a draw. This gives opponent reasons to fold. If you miss on the turn, there is a good chance he will fire another bet of $3 or $4, now what do you do.
Why not min raise his flop bet.(providing you are last to act) You may win the pot there and then. If he calls, there is a good chance he will check the turn. If your flush doesnt hit, you can check behind him. This gives you a river card for less of a price than if you just called his flop bet.
If your flush came on the turn, you would be more likely to take his stack as your play has been deceptive and he would find it difficult to put you on your holding. Especially if you came out betting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.