I use Pokeroffice, what are the differences with PT?

[V_R_L]

here i see everybody is using PT, i use PO. I think it is ok but not super. Is PT a better trackingtool? Here i read a lot of vpip, is this the same as saw flop in PO?

Hope somebody can tell me the pro's and con's of each tool.

thank you [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[FourthWin]

VPIP is not saw flop, but Voluntarily Put ($) into Pot. It's essentially all the times you got into a pot and were not blinded into it.

I use PO, too. It's probably just a matter of opinion which is better, as they both seem to do the same thing and these threads are pretty ubiquitous.

[Bad Beat Maker]

Pokertracker has more support from other programs.

[ranka]

I used PO before and if my database grows very large then the PO was veeeryyy slow.t Because of that I junked the PO and got PT. Also the hand importing is slower and eating more computer resources than PT and there were some real problems with hand importing from Prima Network (I playing there). And I love PT filtering system.

Conclusion: PT is much faster and have greater filtering systems than PO but PT is much harder to use. PO is more "newbie friendly".

[tomtemor]

You can see both VPIP and Saw flop %.

[runningmarvel]

[ QUOTE ]
Pokertracker has more support from other programs.

[/ QUOTE ]
specially since PO doesnt work with FTP at the moment (and hasnt been for the last 2 weeks). The PO-support is absolute CRAP