|
|
|
|
#1
11-25-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 TP against Donkey
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] AF is correlated to VPIP y'all, so this donk ain't exactly passive. [/ QUOTE ] False; the AF PAHUD displays is the postflop aggression factor. [/ QUOTE ] no really it is (credit Mason55) Think about how much betting/raising you have to do postflop to maintain a 1.4AF when playing 64/8 preflop (I realize it's only 31 hands but w/e). 
|
|
#2
11-25-2007, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 TP against Donkey
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] AF is correlated to VPIP y'all, so this donk ain't exactly passive. [/ QUOTE ] False; the AF PAHUD displays is the postflop aggression factor. [/ QUOTE ] no really it is (credit Mason55) Think about how much betting/raising you have to do postflop to maintain a 1.4AF when playing 64/8 preflop (I realize it's only 31 hands but w/e). [/ QUOTE ] Hmm, I didn't look at it from that perspective. Interesting read, thanks.
|
|
#3
11-25-2007, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 TP against Donkey
Panthro is def right about the AF. 1.5 for a 65 VPIP is far from passive. I like checking behind on the turn. As played, I think a 2x c/minr has to beat TP.
|
|
#4
11-25-2007, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 TP against Donkey
and now I am breaking my head over how impossible it is to have a 8% pfr over 30 (or 31) hands lol
|
|
#5
11-26-2007, 02:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 TP against Donkey
I'd check behind turn for pot control. As played, I'd fold turn minraise unless there is history.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
