|
|
#1
05-21-2007, 11:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
OT: LOL P5s
|
|
#4
05-21-2007, 11:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: LOL P5s
i literally just loaded up this forum to post that same link.
cliff notes: donkey claims to know what she's doing and analyses a SNG HH; donkey has no idea; donkey receives criticism; herd of donkeys jump to defence of op donkey
|
|
#5
05-21-2007, 11:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: LOL P5s
thanks for posting this HH
Why would you fold AK in hand 1, but raise it in hand 4?
|
|
#6
05-21-2007, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: LOL P5s
[ QUOTE ]
thanks for posting this HH Why would you fold AK in hand 1, but raise it in hand 4? [/ QUOTE ] Reads baby! Random UTG+1 has a significantly tighter range than random UTG+2. Plus it's not speculative like 34 and you don't have the implied odds.
|
|
#7
05-21-2007, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: LOL P5s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] thanks for posting this HH Why would you fold AK in hand 1, but raise it in hand 4? [/ QUOTE ] Reads baby! Random UTG+1 has a significantly tighter range than random UTG+2. Plus it's not speculative like 34 and you don't have the implied odds. [/ QUOTE ] after reading a few other posts (esp "reads baby!"), I'm guessing this is a joke...
|
|
#9
05-21-2007, 11:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OT: LOL P5s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] thanks for posting this HH Why would you fold AK in hand 1, but raise it in hand 4? [/ QUOTE ] Reads baby! Random UTG+1 has a significantly tighter range than random UTG+2. Plus it's not speculative like 34 and you don't have the implied odds. [/ QUOTE ] after reading a few other posts (esp "reads baby!"), I'm guessing this is a joke... [/ QUOTE ] Of course. To put 2 totally random people in a $60 on ranges significantly different to the point that you'd fold AK in one and call AK in another seemingly solely based on a single pip of table position is hilarious and shows some fuzzy thinking.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
