probably standard AAxx hand

[Triantafylidis]

[ QUOTE ]
fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think some people actually try to get there moneies in while they are ahead rather than a 2:1 dogish... lol

[pete fabrizio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think some people actually try to get there moneies in while they are ahead rather than a 2:1 dogish... lol

[/ QUOTE ]
you're joking, right?

[Parlay Slow]

ez shove

[moon_ake]

do you think villain can do big bluff since your aces are face up?
I fold this against random to nitty, and shove against crazy LAGtard who is capable of reraising with any str8 draw to push you off.

I think the most important is : do you reraise only good aces?

[SaiYeN]

[ QUOTE ]
ez shove

[/ QUOTE ]
Loc: making the dumbest posts in the history of 2+2

i'm confused...

[ QUOTE ]
I think the most important is : do you reraise only good aces?


[/ QUOTE ]
I don't just 3bet good aces but this is the first hand that villain has seen me 3bet. He has just seen me opening/raising limpers a decent amount and a couple times folded to shoves from a shortstack. Postflop, i've done nothing crazy.

[ QUOTE ]
fwiw, i think this is a *snap* all-in. you have ~15% equity against top set, ~35% equity against top 2 pair, ~40% equity against the best possible wrap, about ~45% equity against a pair and open-ender with all live sidecards, and greater than 50% equity against basically everything else, i.e. the myriad of one-pair with 3 live cards hands that he plays the same way. and you only have to call $105 more to win an almost $300 pot. easy easy call and i'm really surprised so many people said otherwise.


[/ QUOTE ]

i folded cause we were kinda deep. I think getting ~2:1 its a easy call. I got odds to call against 2pair, and all draws. But i'm crushed against sets and i dont see him going nuts with 1pair+livecards hands since i obviously have AAxx a lot here.

[Parlay Slow]

It's an easy call at 2 to 1 but a fold at 1.8 to 1?

You go from needing 33% equity to needing 35.5% equity. Just take a look at pete's post if you have any doubts about whether you have 35.5% equity vs his range.

[pete fabrizio]

[ QUOTE ]
i dont see him going nuts with 1pair+livecards hands since i obviously have AAxx a lot here.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you have "no reads", as you professed in the OP, this statement is ridiculous. going nuts with 1 pair + live cards against a likely aces hand is totally standard.

[piiop]

I'd get it in there too. Also, I would've bet more like 30 or full pot instead of 25.

[Parlay Slow]

the people that said fold really suck at poker

[cts]

stick it in not close really from equity / odds standpoint

also preflop gotta repop, the hand just is too strong and plays too well to not get more money in