Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2007, 06:01 AM
NinaWilliams NinaWilliams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Broken-hearted, Battle-scarred
Posts: 2,008
Default Couple pf Qs

CO is 45/27 lag after 150 hands, no notes. Button is 58/8/0.6. His postflop game actually seems decent from what ive seen. In both cases, rank our options.

1)
Preflop Hero is SB with K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
2 folds, <font color="red"> CO raises </font>, button calls, Hero

2) Same action, Hero now has 77.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2007, 06:37 AM
inferno inferno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,402
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

calls both [censored] it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2007, 12:51 PM
Hobbs. Hobbs. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Not Boston
Posts: 5,095
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

2 is an easy call. In case 1 I've been calling here with AT/KQ/KJish hands mainly because with the cold caller I don't feel the need to bloat the pot OOP by 3-betting but my hand is way too good to fold, so I call.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2007, 12:56 PM
Pondy Pondy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 355
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

Both 3-bet.

1. What are you hoping to flop ? not a dominated King.
2. Standard.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:00 PM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

[ QUOTE ]
Both 3-bet.

1. What are you hoping to flop ? not a dominated King.
2. Standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont know what this even means
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:02 PM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

i call the KJ. i might 3 the 77, it depends on how CO + button will react to the reraise - specifically, do you think it will make the hand easy to play postflop?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:06 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

A few important things

1) Are those stats filtered? I know I am being a parrot here. Anyway. What do you think CO's range is?

2) Will BB call 1 bet a lot and fold for 2 a lot or is he either very tight or fairly loose? Its important whether 3-betting increases the probability of him folding. So if he is 18/15 or 50/5 you dont need to 3-bet as much as if he is 30/20 who will call for 1 bet with a lot of hands



If CO's range is 40% or more I am 3-betting both if it means I get BB to fold a lot. If not I call both.

If CO's range is only say 35% I am calling both regardless of BB's type

In any case I am never folding here and the thought of folding is ridiculous IMO.


Using stove your eq isnt bad. Prolly a slight edge. There is a semi moron and a huge moron in the pot who are gonna make mistakes postflop.

No way in hell I am folding anything playable. I am prolly playing

22, Axs, A8o, K5s, KTo, Q7s, QTo, J8s, JTo, T7s, 97s, 86s, 76s, 65s.

Depending on blind structure and BB of course. If its a 2/3 blind structure and BB is a 50/5 guy I am not folding 87o or 63s
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2007, 05:05 PM
vmacosta vmacosta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,060
Default Re: Couple pf Qs

i tend to 3-bet both, but I can see an argument for coolcalling the KJ hand.

Oink,
I'd guess vast majority of ppl who have pfr of 27 are opening &gt; 35% in CO.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.