|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: how bad is your gambling problem | |||
| 1 |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| 2 |
  
|
3 | 5.08% |
| 3 |
  
|
2 | 3.39% |
| 4 |
  
|
1 | 1.69% |
| 5 |
  
|
3 | 5.08% |
| 6 |
  
|
5 | 8.47% |
| 7 |
|
5 | 8.47% |
| 8 |
|
6 | 10.17% |
| 9 |
|
3 | 5.08% |
| 10 |
|
10 | 16.95% |
| I don't think I have one/I'm still in denial. |
|
21 | 35.59% |
| Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
11-05-2007, 12:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full house, what about river?
MP1 would have reraised the turn if he had 89. He should have bet the flop with 56.
I put him on exactly 57 suited or he's played the hand poorly. He's trying to capitalize on the implied odds that he had on the turn. He got raised by a likely straight and was unhappy about having to put $5 in to see the river. It all comes down to reading if he would make a mistake this big, and according to your read I'd lay it down. 
|
|
#13
11-05-2007, 12:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full house, what about river?
[ QUOTE ]
MP1 would have reraised the turn if he had 89. He should have bet the flop with 56. [/ QUOTE ] Not necessarily, he could be slowplaying the nuts on the turn.
|
|
#14
11-07-2007, 09:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full house, what about river?
Called it. I got beat by 77.
BB also called and showed K8...
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
