Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-31-2007, 07:22 PM
SirFelixCat SirFelixCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Calling here, imo, is the worst option. Any spade, 8, 9, T, J, Q, or K comes and we're ???

I think we absolutely have to raise. We don't want BB tagging along getting 3:1 immediate odds on his draw (assuming here).

Too many of you are weak tight here. Call and reevaluate on the turn? If half the deck comes you're hating the spot you put yourself in, therefore, avoid doing so and raise, calling a push from CO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank god, someone that isn't w/t

[/ QUOTE ]

Huge difference from my game 3 weeks ago til now. Then again, I've since moved up to 100NL....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-31-2007, 08:10 PM
Triggerle Triggerle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: What\'s a matter with you, rock?
Posts: 1,439
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

Can you post the rest of the street or will this give away too much?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:03 PM
EMc EMc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Posts: 7,663
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

trigg,

MY concern here at first is my action. No one has still responded to my suggestion of a min raise, the pros and the cons. We have seen arguments for calling, raising PSB or close, im sure some nit said fold.

I will post the rest of the action and the turn later.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:22 PM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

A minraise sucks because if CO has a draw he's not getting punished nearly enough. Sure he calls with QJ or KJ, but I'm sure he calls a bigger raise with them too. This also allows BB to come along cheaper. I kinda stated this when I discussed why calling was bad, but I'd rather have this turn be HU, rather then see a 9 peel off when we're 3-way. I don't see the advantages of a minraise except getting off cheaper when BB shoves (which is really really rare IMO). I'd rather raise more and get more money in when I'm probably ahead rather than call or minraise and get less money in when I am pretty sure I'm ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:25 PM
EMc EMc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Posts: 7,663
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

ok,

Thats that then.

As you can see, I min-raised. I felt as if it allowed me to play perfectly, as it he will likely 3 bet shove a set here, if the turn does bring a spade, I have a re-draw and if he called on the spade draw i have spade re-draw.

So....

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter)

SB: $51.85
BB: $30.55
UTG: $50.60
MP: $105.45
CO: $57.05
EMc (BTN): $49.00

Preflop: EMc is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (6 Players)
2 folds, CO calls $0.50, <font color="red">EMc raises to $2.00</font>, SB folds, BB calls $1.50, CO calls $1.50

Flop: ($6.25) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (3 Players)
BB checks, <font color="red">CO bets $6.25</font>, <font color="red">EMc raises to $12.50</font>, BB folds, CO calls $6.25

Turn: ($31.25) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
CO checks, EMc ?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:26 PM
sightless sightless is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 9,009
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

Minraise I dont like in this spot, because he will fold all his single pairs, call profitably with draws and raise with hands that beat you
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:29 PM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

Since CO just called, I think KQ is in his range, 98 is as well.. as are made flushes. I don't think he just calls the minraise with JT or 22.. this is a difficult spot but I think checking behind and calling any river is pretty decent.

edit - We only have like ~35 left, so we could shove I guess, but I think it folds way too many hands and we could only hope for a call from KsQx or something I think.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-31-2007, 09:55 PM
SirFelixCat SirFelixCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

Well, since you decided to play it this way (which I completely disagree with), I think you either push here or check behind on the turn and either call the push on the river or bet/push the river yourself.

This is the spot that you would have avoided had you made a real raise on the turn. I think you put yourself in a bad spot and now you're ??? because of it.

Hopefully you learn from this. GL.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-31-2007, 10:02 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

raise/call push.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-31-2007, 10:21 PM
SirFelixCat SirFelixCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: 50NL FTP....its been a while

Don't you see why playing it this way is/was a bad idea? you have since given villain 4:1 on his call now on the flop and if he thinks he can get another $6 from you, you made HIM play perfect....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.