Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2007, 01:04 PM
lowpockets lowpockets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FB, GA
Posts: 774
Default $100NL Bluff - too spewy or hell yeah?

11 Hands on Villian - no reads. He requested and used a shitton of time on the turn, so I am more curious about the river bet. Is this too fancy? What do you make of his donk bet on the flop?

Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

SB: $99
BB: $111
UTG: $178.80
Hero (MP): $111.70
CO: $106.50
BTN: $166.25

Pre-Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP)
<font color="red">UTG raises to $3</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $9</font>, 4 folds, UTG calls $6

Flop: ($19.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">UTG bets $9</font>, Hero calls $9

Turn: ($37.50) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $25</font>, UTG calls $25

River: ($87.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $68.70 and is All-In</font>, UTG folds

Results: $87.50 Pot ($3 Rake)
Hero mucked K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] and WON $84.50 (+$41.50 NET)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2007, 01:11 PM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: $100NL Bluff - too spewy or hell yeah?

Would've been easier to raise flop.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2007, 01:31 PM
djshawk djshawk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 427
Default Re: $100NL Bluff - too spewy or hell yeah?

Yeah raising flop is best here I think. The only hand that makes any sense to play like this is AQ, but AQ would probably raise or fold the flop. I think this makes it look to bluffy and vs somebody who thinks about this stuff I think you're getting looked up with quite a lot.

Raising flop doesn't narrow your range down at all so firing again on the turn will get more respect imo.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2007, 02:25 PM
clowntable clowntable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 7,076
Default Re: $100NL Bluff - too spewy or hell yeah?

Re raising the flop (general advice, not this hand):
IMO It depends on how you play your FDs. If you don't always raise them on the flop I see no problem calling here with the intend to bluff on a diamond.
+ raises on the flop get little credit from some villains
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2007, 06:04 PM
Diamond Lie Diamond Lie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Going on a feel
Posts: 1,720
Default Re: $100NL Bluff - too spewy or hell yeah?

Just wondering what exactly you were representing here?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.