|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is this chip dumping/collusion??
PokerStars Game #8547219552: Hold'em Limit ($3/$6) - 2007/02/21 - 02:40:07 (ET)
Table 'Gemma' 6-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 3: Valentine121 ($100 in chips) Seat 4: gmpoker87 ($106.50 in chips) Valentine121: posts small blind $1 gmpoker87: posts big blind $3 *** HOLE CARDS *** Valentine121 said, "hi" gmpoker87 said, "we meet again" Valentine121: raises $3 to $6 gmpoker87: calls $3 *** FLOP *** [Ks 3h 4c] Valentine121 said, "i'll beat you" gmpoker87: bets $3 bigticketmn joins the table at seat #5 Valentine121: raises $3 to $6 gmpoker87: raises $3 to $9 Valentine121: raises $3 to $12 Betting is capped gmpoker87: calls $3 *** TURN *** [Ks 3h 4c] [2c] gmpoker87: bets $6 Valentine121: raises $6 to $12 gmpoker87: raises $6 to $18 Valentine121: raises $6 to $24 Betting is capped gmpoker87: calls $6 *** RIVER *** [Ks 3h 4c 2c] [2d] gmpoker87: bets $6 Valentine121: raises $6 to $12 gmpoker87: raises $6 to $18 Valentine121: raises $6 to $24 Betting is capped gmpoker87: calls $6 *** SHOW DOWN *** Valentine121: shows [Th Ad] (a pair of Deuces) gmpoker87: shows [Kh Ac] (two pair, Kings and Deuces) gmpoker87 collected $131 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $132 | Rake $1 Board [Ks 3h 4c 2c 2d] Seat 3: Valentine121 (button) (small blind) showed [Th Ad] and lost with a pair of Deuces Seat 4: gmpoker87 (big blind) showed [Kh Ac] and won ($131) with two pair, Kings and Deuces PokerStars Game #8547226109: Hold'em Limit ($3/$6) - 2007/02/21 - 02:41:06 (ET) Table 'Gemma' 6-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 3: Valentine121 ($34 in chips) Seat 4: gmpoker87 ($170.50 in chips) Seat 5: bigticketmn ($31 in chips) bigticketmn: posts small blind $1 Valentine121: posts big blind $3 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to bigticketmn [Kc 5h] gmpoker87: calls $3 bigticketmn: calls $2 Valentine121: raises $3 to $6 gmpoker87 said, "check" gmpoker87: calls $3 bigticketmn: calls $3 *** FLOP *** [3d 5d 9h] Valentine121 said, "what ?" bigticketmn: checks Valentine121: checks gmpoker87: bets $3 bigticketmn: raises $3 to $6 Valentine121 said, "i dont check" Valentine121: raises $3 to $9 gmpoker87: calls $6 bigticketmn: calls $3 *** TURN *** [3d 5d 9h] [6c] bigticketmn has timed out while being disconnected bigticketmn is being treated as all-in Valentine121: checks gmpoker87: bets $6 Valentine121: raises $6 to $12 gmpoker87: calls $6 *** RIVER *** [3d 5d 9h 6c] [Ad] Valentine121: checks gmpoker87: checks *** SHOW DOWN *** Valentine121: shows [Qh 4c] (high card Ace) gmpoker87: shows [3s 3h] (three of a kind, Threes) gmpoker87 collected $24 from side pot LPC72 joins the table at seat #6 bigticketmn is disconnected bigticketmn: mucks hand bigticketmn is sitting out gmpoker87 collected $44 from main pot bigticketmn is connected *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $69 Main pot $44. Side pot $24. | Rake $1 Board [3d 5d 9h 6c Ad] Seat 3: Valentine121 (big blind) showed [Qh 4c] and lost with high card Ace Seat 4: gmpoker87 (button) showed [3s 3h] and won ($68) with three of a kind, Threes Seat 5: bigticketmn (small blind) mucked [Kc 5h] Look at the first hand, that looks very suspicious like chip dumping then the second hand when I enter the game and the chat that ensues with the one guy saying to check appears to be collusion. I emailed the support and will see how they handle it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
why would anyone chip dump in a limit game?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
No way people would choose a limit game to chip dump.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
[ QUOTE ]
Look at the first hand, that looks very suspicious like chip dumping then the second hand when I enter the game and the chat that ensues with the one guy saying to check appears to be collusion. I emailed the support and will see how they handle it. [/ QUOTE ] The guy said "check" preflop with a pair of 3's on the button. How is that collusion? If he had said it after flopping trips you might have a valid complaint. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
3/6 limit is THE spot for Canadian drug lord money laundering via chip dumping. It's a problem, a serious problem.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
I don't even know whether to take that reply seriously or not. Can you explain why anyone would choose limit to chip dump?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
Looks like I am going to report you for abusing the disconnection protection. I would be more inclined to think this was chip dumping if they were playing 1/2. Also I am so dumb i am going to collude in chat. so this gives you more evidence.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
why would anyone chip dump in a cash game? this seems rediculous.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
i chip dump in limit games. i find its easier to do as the pots are bigger and not that many questionable plays. "I c/r the turn to steal the pot, so I had to call down on the river with A high."
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is this chip dumping/collusion??
[ QUOTE ]
3/6 limit is THE spot for Canadian drug lord money laundering via chip dumping. It's a problem, a serious problem. [/ QUOTE ] LOL. Alert George Dubya. I knew those SOBS across the river were up to no good and now I have the proof.....And to think they were smart enough to hide it in a low limit LHE game...Good work, detective. OP, this appears to be stupid play (on a number of levels), not chip dumping. At least not the fraud kind. This is actually referred to as "spewing." |
|
|