|
|
|
|
#1
12-02-2007, 12:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
i see what you're saying badbeat, but when post-oak put up his challenge, it IMMEDIATELY showed that cato-tonia was full of crap with his 60% claim. even someone who is new to sports betting knows that money talks. offering a bet and/or seeing it get turned down is a more convincing argument than any amount of replying back and forth. [/ QUOTE ] Also, saying people don't make stupid bets here is false. Happens every month if not far more. 
|
|
#2
12-02-2007, 01:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i see what you're saying badbeat, but when post-oak put up his challenge, it IMMEDIATELY showed that cato-tonia was full of crap with his 60% claim. even someone who is new to sports betting knows that money talks. offering a bet and/or seeing it get turned down is a more convincing argument than any amount of replying back and forth. [/ QUOTE ] Also, saying people don't make stupid bets here is false. Happens every month if not far more. [/ QUOTE ] I propped someone on a Kubiak projection rounding up on receptions and yards. Then additionally citing they had to pass all three standards in Recptions/Yards/TDs. Even money. Its like someone took lessons from Durrrr on how to prop.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
