Official Full TIlt Regulars Thread: Part II

[bozzer]

anyone got anything on THEHOLYHOWL?

[albedoa]

[ QUOTE ]
Solid regs that have given me problems in the past at 50NL:

bor_venin

[/ QUOTE ]

Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

BB: $24.95
UTG: $46.70
Hero (CO): $26
BTN: $21.90
SB: $26.10

Pre-Flop: A A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $0.85</font>, BTN folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $2.95</font>, BB folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $9</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $26.10 and is All-In</font>, Hero calls $17 and is All-In

Flop: ($52.25) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7 9 (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Turn: ($52.25) K (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: ($52.25) T (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $52.25 Pot ($2.60 Rake)
Hero showed A A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON $49.65 (+$23.65 NET)
SB showed Q K (two pair, Kings and Tens) and LOST (-$26 NET)

Yup, solid. I love this guy. If you are losing money to him, you're doing something wrong.

[meleader2]

i do not play as meleader2 on FT, only on stars. those stats are not stars.

[Ender Wiggin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Solid regs that have given me problems in the past at 50NL:

bor_venin

[/ QUOTE ]

Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

BB: $24.95
UTG: $46.70
Hero (CO): $26
BTN: $21.90
SB: $26.10

Pre-Flop: A A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $0.85</font>, BTN folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $2.95</font>, BB folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $9</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $26.10 and is All-In</font>, Hero calls $17 and is All-In

Flop: ($52.25) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7 9 (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Turn: ($52.25) K (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

River: ($52.25) T (2 Players - 1 is All-In)

Results: $52.25 Pot ($2.60 Rake)
Hero showed A A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (two pair, Aces and Tens) and WON $49.65 (+$23.65 NET)
SB showed Q K (two pair, Kings and Tens) and LOST (-$26 NET)

Yup, solid. I love this guy. If you are losing money to him, you're doing something wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

nice suckout, fish.

[hoyasaxa]

[ QUOTE ]
anyone have stats/notes on chessky, cu4cash, and pinest?

[/ QUOTE ]

pinest is 2p2 fwiw

[AZplaya]

voight,
NutJuggler is decent but not as good as you say. Dude calls way to many raises from the blinds, and regularly three bets tags from the blinds with crap like QJo and 86o. Regularly building pots OOP with offsuit just against tags can't be healthy for the winrate.

[BevillTheDevil]

[ QUOTE ]
I'v been giving 160 a spin but that game is like 4x tougher than NL50 (which is 3x tougher than NL30 deep).


[/ QUOTE ]

ive only logged in a few k at 80NL but lol there is no way its 4x tougher than 50NL...IMO it actually could be EZer.

[Mr_Pathetic]

hardly anyone knows how to play deep stack poker at the same level most people play the normal 100bb tables. when I was at the NL five tables on poker stars some of the decent players would buy in for $10 to start raising hands like ATo and folding hands such as 87o. Stuff like that is why I think I ran those levels over so good but started to struggle when I made it to NL10 because I did not adjust my starters based on stack sizes. once I am rolled for the deep tables on full tilt I think I might start playing on them instead of the normal tables. I guess the only drawback to this is the player pool.

[ryang]

&lt;3 waterb0at

[LiveNow]

the deep games dont run enough to 6-8 table them above 30nl.