"Nut Peddling"? PLO/8

[Borys313]

So you guys say it is actually corect to bet without the nuts?

[Buzz]

Hi Borys - The next time you sit in a game, for one random round of the table, keep track of the number of times a hand that is the nuts wins compared to the number of times a hand that is actually not the nuts wins.

I think your question will answer itself.

Buzz

[davebreal]

[ QUOTE ]
Hi Borys - The next time you sit in a game, for one random round of the table, keep track of the number of times a hand that is the nuts wins compared to the number of times a hand that is actually not the nuts wins.

I think your question will answer itself.

Buzz

[/ QUOTE ]

Borys is being sarcastic.

i've played with him online, his play can be described as semi-maniacal... but with some method to his madness.

[Buzz]

[ QUOTE ]
Borys is being sarcastic.

[/ QUOTE ]Thanks Dave - I thought that was probably the case.

But people still read some of those books with the bad advice.

Buzz

[franknagaijr]

[ QUOTE ]
So you guys say it is actually corect to bet without the nuts?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're saying you've never observed a river come high, not filling any obvious draws, and bet with very little other than a feeling that your opponents have bricked?

[spike420211]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So you guys say it is actually corect to bet without the nuts?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're saying you've never observed a river come high, not filling any obvious draws, and bet with very little other than a feeling that your opponents have bricked?

[/ QUOTE ]

only when one of 3 criteria apply:
1> you flop top set, or top 2pr., without a str8 or flush draw on board;

or [obvious draw fills]

2> you are heads up... and you bet the river card like it completed your gutshot str8

or

3> the river shows a 3rd flush card and you have the
lone A of that suit [the "bare ace bluff in PLO hi].
An xtreeeemely dangerous move, too.