Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-26-2007, 09:28 PM
evanski evanski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 286
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
ok i dont know anything about the villain but i'm really snap calling K high here. i hate it when ppl say that when a bluff hand is posted but i'm legit, i really mean it, etc etc etc. this bluff sucks. sorry man.

[/ QUOTE ]

Theres no way this is right. If youre BB, your estimate of heros range is greater than 33% busted draws? Maybe people are saying this bluff wont work because people arent willing to make tough folds after they call the turn in this spot, but seriously, this line looks SUPER strong.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:04 AM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: No longer losing money bluffing
Posts: 19,943
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

op, you think samh is a nit? interesting...
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:49 AM
ActionJeff ActionJeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: though my mind could think I still was a mad man
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
op, you think samh is a nit? interesting...

[/ QUOTE ]

anyone who isn't completely insane is considered to be a nit nowadays
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:56 AM
Jason Strasser (strassa2) Jason Strasser (strassa2) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: durham
Posts: 4,912
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

it looks like you missed a flush draw, of course no one ever bluffs when an obvious flush draw misses! not sure what advice you are out to seek here.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:25 AM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
op, you think samh is a nit? interesting...

[/ QUOTE ]

anyone who isn't completely insane is considered to be a nit nowadays

[/ QUOTE ]

nit is a relative term

and it's not an insult
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-27-2007, 10:41 PM
ActionJeff ActionJeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: though my mind could think I still was a mad man
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
op, you think samh is a nit? interesting...

[/ QUOTE ]

anyone who isn't completely insane is considered to be a nit nowadays

[/ QUOTE ]

nit is a relative term

and it's not an insult

[/ QUOTE ]

I know, just saying

I don't view him as a nit but he is somewhat nitty by normal 25-50 6m standards
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-27-2007, 10:54 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your image at the table seemed to be pretty poor at the time, with you getting caught bluffing medium/big a few times and generally racing around the table, so I hated the play. As it turned out, this guy was a bit of a postflop calling station too, (you may not have known yet), but cmon, king, you can't try to force over EVERY pot. Your hand plays SO much better RR'd pre than doing this at the deep tables, and your flop play looks exactly like what it is. methinks you were tilting more than a bit at the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

it was a bad play but it had little to do with tilt, andwhy wouldn't I generally try to run over a lineup this weak? samh was the only guy I knew and he's a nit.

it was more like, leading sucks because he's gonna call me with everything he called on the flop, check folding sucks, check calling really sucks, so wth, process of elimination I'll c/r. river was a panic shove and pretty inexcusable I admit

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Also, panic, maybe, but you did time down before shoving.

P.S. Dunno about trying to run over calling stations. Nits like me, sure, but calling stations?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-27-2007, 10:57 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
ok i dont know anything about the villain but i'm really snap calling K high here. i hate it when ppl say that when a bluff hand is posted but i'm legit, i really mean it, etc etc etc. this bluff sucks. sorry man.

[/ QUOTE ]

Example of this type of call plz or I call shenanigans!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:06 AM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: No longer losing money bluffing
Posts: 19,943
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ok i dont know anything about the villain but i'm really snap calling K high here. i hate it when ppl say that when a bluff hand is posted but i'm legit, i really mean it, etc etc etc. this bluff sucks. sorry man.

[/ QUOTE ]

Example of this type of call plz or I call shenanigans!

[/ QUOTE ]
hahaha! she has Q high calls up the wazoo...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:26 AM
tcorbin16 tcorbin16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,649
Default Re: 15/30 deep bluff

i dont hate this as much as everyone else does, but i am struggling to see what he is betting on the turn and then calling and then will fold the river.

maybe like Jxss?

although the river card does suck because your hands like A2 dont shove anymore and its harder for you to have the 3
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.