#1
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1020 Two Baby Pair vs Name Player
why don't you say who the "Name Player" is?
i'd give up. check/fold |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1020 Two Baby Pair vs Name Player
give up on the hand. you're behind, you're unlikely to improve, and you're unlikely to get him to fold.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1020 Two Baby Pair vs Name Player
Value from ... 54? Nope, i'm happy to show it down for free.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1020 Two Baby Pair vs Name Player
[ QUOTE ]
Value from ... 54? Nope, i'm happy to show it down for free. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|