Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: 0-$20k
0-20% 9 50.00%
20-40% 6 33.33%
40-60% 1 5.56%
60-80% 0 0%
80-100% 2 11.11%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-24-2007, 07:38 AM
br.bm br.bm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 601
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

I don't correct pots after is entered a stack and the cards are reshuffeld.
Everybody could say "hey you was wrong" two hands later.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:18 PM
Sir Folds A Lot Sir Folds A Lot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 140
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

Yeah, once action started on the next hand, that hand should be dead as far as everyone is concerned. If it was my home game, I would sympathized with him, but I wlso would have explained why we can't correct it.

If you had corrected it, you might get a player argue, "I would have played the two hands afterward differently with the different chip stack sizes" and down the sippery slope you go.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-26-2007, 04:05 PM
Albert Moulton Albert Moulton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Live Full Ring NLHE
Posts: 2,377
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

[ QUOTE ]
...figured it would set too slippery of a president and result in future conflicts of the same nature.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you are correct, here. If any correction needed to be done, then it should have been done at the time the hand was being played. 3-hands later is too late.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-26-2007, 05:29 PM
jeffnc jeffnc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,631
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

There are several reasons the play must stand - no changes now.

The stack sizes in the mean time could easily have affected play of intervening hands.

It slows down play - anyone at any time could explain "with remarkable accuracy" how a previous hand should have been different. It's sort of like going all in when the board shows the nuts. What have you got to lose? You MIGHT be rewarded some chips if no one else can remember exactly. So you might as well try it all night long.

It doesn't encourage people to pay attention before the hand is over, which is the only time you can actually see the chips and have a chance to correct the error at a point when no one can debate the facts. This is something that you have to encourage.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-26-2007, 05:34 PM
Black Aces 518 Black Aces 518 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: play bad, run bad
Posts: 1,752
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

[ QUOTE ]
...figured it would set too slippery of a president

[/ QUOTE ]

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-27-2007, 03:33 PM
Lottery Larry Lottery Larry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Home Poker in da HOOWWSSS!
Posts: 6,198
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

I need a picture of Tricky Dick....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:44 PM
pfapfap pfapfap is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Play Bad and Get There
Posts: 1,799
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...figured it would set too slippery of a president

[/ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

Heeeee.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-30-2007, 01:39 AM
Explicit65 Explicit65 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: $.5/1 NL and $100 SNGS
Posts: 56
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

tough one, unless everyone agrees to correct it id say its too late.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-31-2007, 05:22 PM
ShannonRyu ShannonRyu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 139
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

ah, now I see... precedent, not president. Funny. I probably have misspelled it like that a hundred times. Thanks for the help on the poll, but more-so for the vocabulary/spelling lesson. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-01-2007, 07:36 AM
Innosin Innosin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: To correct, or not to correct, that is the question.

Nope, same here, don't correct it after the next hand being startet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.